Bill wrote: >No problem, I personally do not care for cubism either and have my own opinions about. However, I can't discount its place within the art movement regardless of what I think. Sometimes these "gimmicks" are stepping stones, and we have to let them happen (or tolerate them if you prefer).< Oh, I disagree. Just because something causes a reaction doesn't mean it has merit. Poison ivy causes a reaction. Now, I'm not saying this is the case with Wiard. It's actually part of the art argument, and I can't go there, alas,lest we stray too far off topic. >Now, I have been curious about something...if you were to design a synth, panel and electronics, how would you do it? How would you blend your love for art with your love for electronics? Grant obviously has an interpretation, and I would love to hear about your view.< I'll do more than that; I'll show you. If you go to the Photos section, and click on the Mitchell folder, you will find a picture of a vocoder I built in 1980. Although there are things I'd change today, it will give you some idea of where I'm coming from. This folder and picture will be removed in a day or two to make room for Wiard-related stuff. So have at it, lads! johnm
Message
Fwd: [AH] Re: Synth Graphics, speaking of which
2002-11-22 by konkuro
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.