Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Thread

My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.

My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.

2005-10-01 by Norman Fay

I played a concert in Leeds, UK last night, doing this kind of spacy
synth music/prog rock thing that me and my guitarist friend Mark do. 
I thought it would be fun and perhaps creative to take the
Wiard/Blacet synth along, and indeed it was.   I planned to use it
partly to cover sections where I was loading in backing parts to the
sequencer, and partly for improv bits.  After we'd done our proper
soundcheck, and when the other musicians were doing their soundchecks,
I turned off our onstage monitors and set up the modular on
headphones.  Obviously, I didn't have time to set up some great
detailed patch, and it would have been stupid to do so anyway, given
the nature of what we were playing.  I set it up as follows, dividing
it into as many different sound generating "cells" as I could:

1/the noise ring fed one of the waveform city wave shapers, which was
set to one of the quantising wavetables.  This then ran into the omni
filter, and this went into the x1 input of the LH mixolator.  The omni
filter cutoff was controlled by the ar envelope of the waveform city. 
The idea was to have a kind of randomly generated sequence.

2/the other waveform city ran into a blacet frequency divider, which
ran into a borg filter, then into the x2 input of the lh mixolator. 
The idea here was to have a manually controlled drone, where I could
control the timber of the drone via the borg, and add interesting
subharmonics via the level controls on the frequency divider.

3/a woggle bug output via a borg to the y input of the lh mixolator. 
the clock out of the wogglebug triggered a blacet EG1, which
controlled the cutoff of the borg.  I took the step cv out of the
other half of the wogglebug, and stuck it into the decay cv of the
EG1.  I was kind of hoping for the transmission from outer space thing
the wogglebug can do.

LH mixolator x+ out went to x in of RH mixolator. LH mixolator x- out
went to a blacet time machine.  The output from the time machine went
to the y input of the RH mixolator, using the joystick I could control
the balance between the wogglebug and the 2 more, er, "tonal" elements
on the horizontal axis, and the blend between dry sound and delay on
the vertical.

I used the wiard/blacet during 2 improvised sections.  During the
first, I mainly used the wogglebug.  I suppose you'd have to say it
was a failure, though I had an absolute blast -
I didn't realise just how overpowering the sound of the wogglebug
would be!  It went full on and just totally overwhelmed everything.  I
was grinning like a maniac, but at the end there was just this shocked
silence from the audience.

The second section was better.  I brought up the noise ring controlled
sequence pattern, and since the soundcheck it had settle into playing
this beautiful harp glissando like riff.  When I turned it up, I was
just like wow, listen to that.  It kicked us off into this great,
albeit somewhat disjointed improv.  Just about exactly what I was
hoping for. noise ring thru quantiser is such a great source of
inspiration.

The strengths of the Wiard in this situation are/were plain - mainly
the way in which it can easily be divided into several
sound-generating cells, but also its unpredictability, the way it can
throw up something to surprise you, and give you something to strike
off from.

Also, of course, it sounds great.  This goes for the Blacet modules
too - I had the Binary Zone in the rack as well, and I wish I'd used
that last night.

In the music scene the event was aimed at, the most common/accepted
way of using a modular instrument on stage is "berlin school" style -
a Moog, or more commonly an "arrick" set up to play step sequencer
patterns and thunderous bass drones a la Tangerine Dream "Ricochet". 
While I have respect for several artists creating music in that style,
Wiard-style is more inspiring to me, I think.  I'll certainly do this
again.

So, although it may be scary to take yr Wiard instrument out to play
live - the fear of theft or damage is obviously pretty grim, I
recommend it very strongly, it's a real thrill.

Apologies for any typos, and for rambling on so.

Re: [wiardgroup] My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.

2005-10-02 by Scott Stites

Thanks for that Norman, I'd love to have heard that set.

"It went full on and just totally overwhelmed everything.  I
was grinning like a maniac, but at the end there was just this shocked
silence from the audience."

Sounds like a "Back to the Future" moment - "I know that didn't seem like
much to you, but your kids will love it. ..."  =0)

Cheers,
Scott
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman Fay" <vietgrove@gmail.com>
To: <wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 7:37 AM
Subject: [wiardgroup] My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.


> I played a concert in Leeds, UK last night, doing this kind of spacy
> synth music/prog rock thing that me and my guitarist friend Mark do.
> I thought it would be fun and perhaps creative to take the
> Wiard/Blacet synth along, and indeed it was.   I planned to use it
> partly to cover sections where I was loading in backing parts to the
> sequencer, and partly for improv bits.  After we'd done our proper
> soundcheck, and when the other musicians were doing their soundchecks,
> I turned off our onstage monitors and set up the modular on
> headphones.  Obviously, I didn't have time to set up some great
> detailed patch, and it would have been stupid to do so anyway, given
> the nature of what we were playing.  I set it up as follows, dividing
> it into as many different sound generating "cells" as I could:
>
> 1/the noise ring fed one of the waveform city wave shapers, which was
> set to one of the quantising wavetables.  This then ran into the omni
> filter, and this went into the x1 input of the LH mixolator.  The omni
> filter cutoff was controlled by the ar envelope of the waveform city.
> The idea was to have a kind of randomly generated sequence.
>
> 2/the other waveform city ran into a blacet frequency divider, which
> ran into a borg filter, then into the x2 input of the lh mixolator.
> The idea here was to have a manually controlled drone, where I could
> control the timber of the drone via the borg, and add interesting
> subharmonics via the level controls on the frequency divider.
>
> 3/a woggle bug output via a borg to the y input of the lh mixolator.
> the clock out of the wogglebug triggered a blacet EG1, which
> controlled the cutoff of the borg.  I took the step cv out of the
> other half of the wogglebug, and stuck it into the decay cv of the
> EG1.  I was kind of hoping for the transmission from outer space thing
> the wogglebug can do.
>
> LH mixolator x+ out went to x in of RH mixolator. LH mixolator x- out
> went to a blacet time machine.  The output from the time machine went
> to the y input of the RH mixolator, using the joystick I could control
> the balance between the wogglebug and the 2 more, er, "tonal" elements
> on the horizontal axis, and the blend between dry sound and delay on
> the vertical.
>
> I used the wiard/blacet during 2 improvised sections.  During the
> first, I mainly used the wogglebug.  I suppose you'd have to say it
> was a failure, though I had an absolute blast -
> I didn't realise just how overpowering the sound of the wogglebug
> would be!  It went full on and just totally overwhelmed everything.  I
> was grinning like a maniac, but at the end there was just this shocked
> silence from the audience.
>
> The second section was better.  I brought up the noise ring controlled
> sequence pattern, and since the soundcheck it had settle into playing
> this beautiful harp glissando like riff.  When I turned it up, I was
> just like wow, listen to that.  It kicked us off into this great,
> albeit somewhat disjointed improv.  Just about exactly what I was
> hoping for. noise ring thru quantiser is such a great source of
> inspiration.
>
> The strengths of the Wiard in this situation are/were plain - mainly
> the way in which it can easily be divided into several
> sound-generating cells, but also its unpredictability, the way it can
> throw up something to surprise you, and give you something to strike
> off from.
>
> Also, of course, it sounds great.  This goes for the Blacet modules
> too - I had the Binary Zone in the rack as well, and I wish I'd used
> that last night.
>
> In the music scene the event was aimed at, the most common/accepted
> way of using a modular instrument on stage is "berlin school" style -
> a Moog, or more commonly an "arrick" set up to play step sequencer
> patterns and thunderous bass drones a la Tangerine Dream "Ricochet".
> While I have respect for several artists creating music in that style,
> Wiard-style is more inspiring to me, I think.  I'll certainly do this
> again.
>
> So, although it may be scary to take yr Wiard instrument out to play
> live - the fear of theft or damage is obviously pretty grim, I
> recommend it very strongly, it's a real thrill.
>
> Apologies for any typos, and for rambling on so.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>   a..  Visit your group "wiardgroup" on the web.
>
>   b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    wiardgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>   c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>

live at leeds

2005-10-03 by drmabuce

Hi Norman
--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Norman Fay <vietgrove@g...> wrote:
> Apologies for any typos, and for rambling on so.

speaking strictly for myself..

au contraire!
i love to see somebody else's account of wiardness so lovingly detailed!

lately i've gigged out with the SNO cases (containing 300 and
1200-series Wiards) at least once a month and i want to amplify your
comment about the Wiard's (especially 300) 'dvisibility' into many
voices. There's a lot of functionality under those panels and that
aspect really shines in live shows when 'just one more' LFO will make
the difference between a static timbre and an animated one. The
JAG/Blacet dual linear VCA(x2) has become especially indispensable to
my live performances. It even saved our butts by standing in for a
broken monitor mixer once!!!! 

i share your fears about theft and damage too, my whole band (&
occasional crew) are conditioned, by now, to not even offer to pick up
the SNO cabinets and the Cabs always ride in my car, with me, never in
the truck. A bicycle cable through the handles tethers them backstage
if they have to be unattended during frantic "inter-band" gear
switching. i've tried using samples of my analogs ala Ableton Live and
i won't lie and say that that method isn't very effective too, but
it's a different instrument, plain and simple, and try as i might,
i've found nothing that rivals live analog for immediacy and gestural
responsiveness, especially in improvisation.

i enjoyed your account very much, thanx
avanti!

-doc




> I played a concert in Leeds, UK last night, doing this kind of spacy
> synth music/prog rock thing that me and my guitarist friend Mark do. 
> I thought it would be fun and perhaps creative to take the
> Wiard/Blacet synth along, and indeed it was.   I planned to use it
> partly to cover sections where I was loading in backing parts to the
> sequencer, and partly for improv bits.  After we'd done our proper
> soundcheck, and when the other musicians were doing their soundchecks,
> I turned off our onstage monitors and set up the modular on
> headphones.  Obviously, I didn't have time to set up some great
> detailed patch, and it would have been stupid to do so anyway, given
> the nature of what we were playing.  I set it up as follows, dividing
> it into as many different sound generating "cells" as I could:
> 
> 1/the noise ring fed one of the waveform city wave shapers, which was
> set to one of the quantising wavetables.  This then ran into the omni
> filter, and this went into the x1 input of the LH mixolator.  The omni
> filter cutoff was controlled by the ar envelope of the waveform city. 
> The idea was to have a kind of randomly generated sequence.
> 
> 2/the other waveform city ran into a blacet frequency divider, which
> ran into a borg filter, then into the x2 input of the lh mixolator. 
> The idea here was to have a manually controlled drone, where I could
> control the timber of the drone via the bor
g, and add interesting
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> subharmonics via the level controls on the frequency divider.
> 
> 3/a woggle bug output via a borg to the y input of the lh mixolator. 
> the clock out of the wogglebug triggered a blacet EG1, which
> controlled the cutoff of the borg.  I took the step cv out of the
> other half of the wogglebug, and stuck it into the decay cv of the
> EG1.  I was kind of hoping for the transmission from outer space thing
> the wogglebug can do.
> 
> LH mixolator x+ out went to x in of RH mixolator. LH mixolator x- out
> went to a blacet time machine.  The output from the time machine went
> to the y input of the RH mixolator, using the joystick I could control
> the balance between the wogglebug and the 2 more, er, "tonal" elements
> on the horizontal axis, and the blend between dry sound and delay on
> the vertical.
> 
> I used the wiard/blacet during 2 improvised sections.  During the
> first, I mainly used the wogglebug.  I suppose you'd have to say it
> was a failure, though I had an absolute blast -
> I didn't realise just how overpowering the sound of the wogglebug
> would be!  It went full on and just totally overwhelmed everything.  I
> was grinning like a maniac, but at the end there was just this shocked
> silence from the audience.
> 
> The second section was better.  I brought up the noise ring controlled
> sequence pattern, and since the soundcheck it had settle into playing
> this beautiful harp glissando like riff.  When I turned it up, I was
> just like wow, listen to that.  It kicked us off into this great,
> albeit somewhat disjointed improv.  Just about exactly what I was
> hoping for. noise ring thru quantiser is such a great source of
> inspiration.
> 
> The strengths of the Wiard in this situation are/were plain - mainly
> the way in which it can easily be divided into several
> sound-generating cells, but also its unpredictability, the way it can
> throw up something to surprise you, and give you something to strike
> off from.
> 
> Also, of course, it sounds great.  This goes for the Blacet modules
> too - I had the Binary Zone in the rack as well, and I wish I'd used
> that last night.
> 
> In the music scene the event was aimed at, the most common/accepted
> way of using a modular instrument on stage is "berlin school" style -
> a Moog, or more commonly an "arrick" set up to play step sequencer
> patterns and thunderous bass drones a la Tangerine Dream "Ricochet". 
> While I have respect for several artists creating music in that style,
> Wiard-style is more inspiring to me, I think.  I'll certainly do this
> again.
> 
> So, although it may be scary to take yr Wiard instrument out to play
> live - the fear of theft or damage is obviously pretty grim, I
> recommend it very strongly, it's a real thrill.
>

Re: My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.

2005-10-05 by Gary Chang

Norman Fay <vietgrove@g...> wrote:

> 1/the noise ring fed one of the waveform city wave shapers, which was
> set to one of the quantising wavetables. 

This is the patch of the millenium, isn't it?  I mean, last millenium,
there was the Buchla Sources Of Uncertainty, which was so cool because
it was random, but played very musical random patterns.  

The Noise Ring, quantized by a Waveform City gives you that effect
exactly, with the improvement of actual selectable scaler music notes
(the Buchla's output had a very World Music sound to it, because it
wasn't quantized to a 12 tone scale).

Record your concerts, Norman!  Love to hear what you are doing!

gc

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: My wiard synthesiser made its live debut.

2005-10-06 by Norman Fay

Here are some pix, for anyone that might be interested.  They are a
bit dingy, for which my apologies.  I'm the one on the right. The
Wiard is in the wooden box, centre stage, I said CENTRE STAGE!!  A
couple of them show me manipulating the thing, none, unfortunately,
show it from in front (or behind - you could see the LEDs twinkling
through the back of the case!)

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/Vietgrove/DSCN0588.jpg

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/Vietgrove/DSCN0582.jpg

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/Vietgrove/DSCN0581.jpg

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/Vietgrove/DSCN0579.jpg

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b379/Vietgrove/DSCN0577.jpg

Apparently someone videoed the event, and is sending me a DVD of our
set.  I'll clip some sections out and post them up somewhere, if any
are good enough.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 10/5/05, Gary Chang <gchang@calarts.edu> wrote:
>  Norman Fay <vietgrove@g...> wrote:
>
> > 1/the noise ring fed one of the waveform city wave shapers, which was
> > set to one of the quantising wavetables.
>
> This is the patch of the millenium, isn't it?  I mean, last millenium,
> there was the Buchla Sources Of Uncertainty, which was so cool because
> it was random, but played very musical random patterns.
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.