Thanks again. I think I'll need to go and play with the Vintage Rack at
my local guitar center before I decide to totally ditch the XL-7 ROM.
rEalm
robotchas <robotchas@...>
05/10/2004 04:20 PM
Please respond to xl7
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
cc:
Subject: [xl7] Re: Vintage Collection ROM Review
SOP for me when checking out a new sample-based synth (or in this
case, sample ROM) is to disable the effects, open up the filters and
kill any modulation, and then step through each of the individual raw
samples. They hold up very well for the most part...there are some
places where the keymap points are apparent, but I didn't notice
anything that couldn't be covered by a little
filtering/layering/whatever.
And happily, most of the filter sweeps are generated by the Command
Station and NOT embedded in the sample itself. I hate that.
Exceptions include several of the synth basses (which is to be
expected) and the Rogue waves, but at least you can set SampleStart
to 127 to trim off the transient. The raw waves are indeed raw.
That said, the presets are well done (I usually hate E-mu presets,
sorry programmers) - they sound good but aren't so distinctive as to
be unuseable. No DigitalNativeDance or SkiJam here.
Bear in mind that the XL ROM has a much broader range of waveforms to
play with than the Vintage. I personally prefer the sound of the
Vintage, but I wouldn't want to exchange one for the other as I find
they work better in concert. I have little interest in samples of non-
electronic instruments though, so YMWV.
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> Thanks man, that's very helpful! I've been debating swapping my XL-
7 ROM
> with the Vintage, and I think you may have sold me. One more
question for
> the Vintage Rom owners though:
>
> I typically don't use factory presets in my songs, preferring
instead to
> start with a blank Preset and browse the Instruments in order to
choose my
> sounds. So, are the Vintage Instruments good on their own, or do
they
> require Preset patchcord work to sound good? IE, are the factory
presets
> good because of the way they have been programmed, or is the source
> material good on it's own too?
>
> rEalm
Yahoo! Groups Links
The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally
privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than
the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege
or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of , or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
For Translation:
http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] Re: Vintage Collection ROM Review
2004-05-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.