On 9/9/04 4:13 PM, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@...> wrote: >>>> still, it sounds pretty terrible, but i mean that in the cool industrial >>>> meaning of terrible. ;D >>> Is bad good again? |8-)> >> you don't like the track? or is it just about bruddah >> max' comment? >> >> hans >> >> ps: what i find most interesting is a gritty dirty >> broken sound rich in detail and atmosphere. that's >> what i hope to achieve eventually. mind you, good gear >> is very practical to sculpt rough detailed sounds. > I am sorry. My comment was about Bruddah Max's use of "terrible." I > enjoyed listening to your piece. I thought it was a neat mixture of > crisp, clean sounds with what sounded like overmodulated headphone > distortion. From what you wrote (below) that seems like part of your > goal. --Steve ok just to make it clear that i was praising the piece as industrial music, which inherently sounds terrible to the ear (as opposed to a nice bit of Mozart or what have you, which sounds pleasing and "nice" to the ear). so it is good because it sounds terrible and this was the intention of the composer. does that make sense? now, my own stuff tends to sound terrible in a non-intentional way. but, as Conan's chronicler would say, that is another story... -- Bruddah Max Lord of the Dance
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: new track .:hz.kontrakt.ion:.
2004-09-09 by Bruddah Max
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.