> ok just to make it clear that i was praising the > piece as industrial music, > which inherently sounds terrible to the ear (as > opposed to a nice bit of > Mozart or what have you, which sounds pleasing and > "nice" to the ear). my humble opinion on this: a tad of distortion and grittiness sounds really _nice_ to me, not terrible. i for myself would replace the word 'nice' with 'clean' in the statement above. clean can be nice as well of course. (i find myself listening to classical music very often, actually. same goes for clean electric/electronic music. i'm very interested in music in general, not in genres/styles/scenes.) i got your point from the first post, anyway. so no prob :o) thanks for clarifying though. hans ===== feindbild musik: check http://www.electrobel.be, user feindbild http://www.etherialdawn.be http://www.isabellableeds.com http://www.spectre.be -|[ G E R \ufffd U S C H D I C H T E ]|- ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: new track .:hz.kontrakt.ion:
2004-09-10 by G e r a e u s c h d i c h t e
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.