Correction: the EMX will do 8-bar loops (I think the original Electribes were limited to 4). --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "robotchas" <robotchas@...> wrote: > > The XL-7 is polyphonic (the MX is not), 32-part multitimbral, has a > much more powerful synthesis engine, a lot more samples, can do longer > patterns (32 bar vs. 4, I believe), can mix tracks from different > patterns, has a higher resolution sequencer, has more outputs, better > sound quality, etc. > > The Electribe is cool for what it is, but compared to the XL-7 it's a > toy. The best things about it are the simple, immediate interface, > small size, and the funky effects, probably. Oh, and if it gets > trashed at a gig it probably won't break your heart. Lots of people > are doing interesting things with them, though. > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Dacian Victor <dacian_victor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm curios, what are main diference between these 2 ??? > > EMU XL-7 vs. Korg Electribe MX > > > > Korg Electribe it's a lot smaller @:), but i have no idee how it's > sound !!! > > > > > > Daci > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
Message
Re: EMU XL-7 vs. Korg Electribe MX
2006-12-04 by robotchas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.