> As far as synths go, the synth engines are very similar with the > exception of the modulation matrix (IE patchcords) on the XL7, but > this might be harder to follow and you may not use it as much. ...in other words, the XL-7 is far superior as a synthesiser, what with the Z-plane filters, clock-based modulation matrix, arpeggiator integration, etc. etc. I bought my XL-7 based on my experience with the Morpheus and Audity, so the MC-505 wouldn't have impressed me much at all. In general, Roland stuff sounds lovely (and they have good preset designers), but they've always been a little quirky and arbitrary when it comes to control structures and modulation architectures. Their user interfaces are varied, ranging from useable to execrable. -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Help MC-505 vs. XL-7
2002-06-26 by Nick Rothwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.