From the EMU spec sheets: xx-7: Data Encoding: 16-bit linear, 24-bit DAC's, Signal to Noise: >100 dB Frequency Response: 20-20,000Hz (+0.0/-0.1dB) THD + Noise (DAC's): <0.002% Power Consumption: 15 watts Voltage Input: 90VAC 260VAC at 50Hz 60 Hz Maximum Output Level: +6dBV Output Impedance: 1000 Ohms P2500: Data Encoding: 16-bit linear, 24-bit DAC's, Signal to Noise: >100 dB Frequency Response: 20-20,000Hz (+0.0/-0.1dB) THD + Noise (DAC's): <0.002% Power Consumption: 15 watts Voltage Input: 90VAC 260VAC at 50Hz 60 Hz Maximum Output Level: +6dBV Output Impedance: 1000 Ohms Looks identical to me... /Jon --- In xl7@y..., "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@h...> wrote: > I am not sure about these claims. My understanding was that the XX- 7 and > p2500 are identical except for the casing. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nathan Larson" <greenhousemusic@h...> > To: <xl7@y...> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:55 PM > Subject: Re: [xl7] Why buy a 2500? > > > > The Proteus 2500 has a faster processor than the XX-7 and P2K. It also > has > > 24 bit digital outs where as the XX-7 has 20 bit. My guess on the faster > > CPU is probably most people using the 2500 would be doing big 32 track > > sequences via a computer and that faster processor would come in handy. > The > > XX-7 has the internal 16 track sequencer and most people would use that > > rather than a computer based sequencer and the 32 channels. Hence no need > > for the faster CPU. Just a guess on their thoughts though... > > > > Nathan > >
Message
Re: Why buy a 2500?
2002-10-22 by Jon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.