I think it's going to be on the Fantom-S also :) --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Andre Lewis" <andrel@s...> wrote: > That's what I really wat to know, what's missing from the 505 to the 909 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ravi Ivan Sharma [mailto:noision1@h...] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:27 PM > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds > > > Call it variphrase lite or whatever you want, it does timestretch on the fly > (acid like) any samples that are part of a pattern. I think this is pretty > powerful in a live situation so you can have patterns containing samples and > then sync to any band using the tap tempo button. This is the joy of a good > groovebox, but until the 909 it was impossible to do with samples. As far as I > know, you can have samples on all tracks of a pattern if you want. > > IMO that is the best thing about the 909. Unfortunately they left out megamix > and removed other features like accessible delay controls for tracks which were > good live tools on the MC909. > > Ravi > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Aaron Eppolito > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:24 PM > Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds > > > --- "studio_6512 <studio6512@c...>" wrote: > > My buddy has the MC-909, I plan on getting it as a part of the > > production studio, just because the variphrase sampler is awesome. > > I played with the 909 at NAMM, and as far as I can tell, it doesn't > have variphrase. The demo guys were pretty clueless when I asked him > "How many voices of Variphrase does it do?" I got all sorts of answers > from "All of them" to "Uh, well you have 16 tracks..." to "Well, this > turntable emulation thing can slow..." > > After really working on it for a while with one of the Roland guys, it > seems that the 909's "Variphrase-like" ability comes from being able to > chop up a sample into smaller looped samples and playing them with an > arpeggiator thing. For the factory sounds, this seemed to happen > automatically. We couldn't figure out how to do it with something we > sampled. > > In any case, the sound quality was what you'd expect from slowing down > a vocal (for example) where each syllable was looped: pretty stuttery. > It sounded nothing like their Variphrase technology. Their brochure > also doesn't mention Variphrase anywhere in it either. The only thing > it does mention is the ability to timestretch *out of realtime*. > > -Aaron > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds
2003-01-29 by OneSneakYmousE <onesneakymouse@onesneaky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.