Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

For the price of an RS7000, you can buy an XL-7 and a used yamaha RM1x. 

This will give you 32 tracks at once, on two very complementary sequencers, and the emu sound set. It beats either unit alone, hands down; I can't recomend this combination highly enough.

bIz


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: stevenlebeau 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:33 AM
  Subject: [xl7] Re: Sequencer


  I had an RS-7000 for about a year (before I sold it to buy my XL-7). 
  The RS-7000 is a cool sequencer in a lot of ways, but it (along with 
  every previous Yamaha sequencer) also has some characteristics that 
  can lead to some frustration.

  What I liked about the RS-7000:

  * Dedicated knobs to control a track's velocity, gate, and add midi 
  delays
  * The ability to create "phrases" which could be used in multiple 
  patterns/songs.
  * Track Split (note to e-mu: get on this one!): Allows you to record 
  your drums on one track and then split it into several individual-
  drum tracks (especially useful for multitrack recording with the 
  digital outputs).
  * 480 PPQ (much easier on my brain)

  What I didn't like about the RS-7000:
  * In order for a song to play without "hiccups" when patterns 
  change, one has to convert the pattern chain to a "song."
  * Onboard sounds are generally weak, except for the drums which are 
  generally really good. And the synth architecture isn't a quarter the 
  quality of E-mu's. (Sounds can only have 2 layers).
  * Even if the synth architecture was good, you can only edit presets 
  and save those settings with the pattern you're working on (i.e., you 
  can't truly create your own presets with their own names, etc.)
  * Digital output is not standard.
  * General Midi (yuck!)
  * Sequences must be saved to external smart media card or scsi. 
  Contents of memory erased when powered down. 

  Trust me: get the XL-7. The RS-7000 wasn't the pinnacle of Yamaha's 
  hardware sequencers. Even that still required one to expand backing 
  tracks (similar to "convert pattern chain to song" on the RS-7000) in 
  order to not have timing hiccups. (BTW, no operating system upgrades 
  will ever fix these bugs, as Yamaha have stated time and time again). 

  The XL-7 is so much more user-friendly in so many ways. You can 
  effortlessly switch recording modes before an idea evaporates from 
  your ADHD-stricken brain, and the powerful synthesis engine means you 
  can actually use the onboard sounds. I wasn't ever able to use my RS-
  7000 as a portable composer's workbench because it just didn't sound 
  good!

  Another thing that should be mentioned is E-mu's much-higher level of 
  dedication to their customer base. Yamaha have a reputation for 
  releasing a couple of O.S. upgrades and then moving on to concentrate 
  on some other product. E-mu has a reputation for continually refining 
  their operating systems  (Their E4 Ultra line are up to O.S. 4.7, if 
  I'm correct). I guarantee that the XL-7 will, with the release of 
  some future operating system, add some of the features I did like 
  from the RS-7000 (the "split drum tracks" job would really be 
  helpful...). 




  > I'm thinking about getting an Xl-7 to sequence my external gear.. 
  but 
  > i was wondering if the sequencer is anygood (Rs7000 style)?
  > 
  > Cheers


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]