Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:09 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 223 of 476 · 23793 messages matched

Re: [xl7] Re: SPDIF signal enhancers

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

the quality of Normalization does depend on the software that is being used to Normalize, and of course we all know that in the N process the audio takes a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: BPM syncronisation device

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Hmm, the only thing I could find was this: http://www.behringer.com/02_products/prodindex_dj.cfm?id=DFX69&lang=ENG&CFID=1534616&CFTOKEN=84916988 It ll detect

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: BPM syncronisation device

2004-02-11 by vibesart

I believe that Behringer has just released a copy of the Red Sound BPM detector/sync device (NAMM 2004) ... does. I ... recommend ... quite

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: SPDIF signal enhancers

2004-02-11 by vibesart

Yo rEalm - another POV on this (my own, altho I am not glued to this method...) the quality of Normalization does depend on the software that is being used to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Mainly I just need a simple tabletop sampler with hands on control of effects and filter. It ll only be for live use triggering simple loops and one shots, so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] BPM syncronisation device

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

I actually use a MicroSync for the same thing you re trying to do, and like you I couldn t find anything else that came close to what it does. I do know there

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Damn Ravi, that s an excellent idea I hadn t considered yet.... thanks. rEalm Depending on whether you must have multisamples or not, the announced FantomX

Thread view Attachments: 0

SPDIF signal enhancers

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

To be honest, there s really no need to use one (I don t think they even exist). Even though the signal is quiet, you can still normalize it to a hotter level

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Nah, the park near me has power outlets in one section (I call it Studio B). I WISH there was a battery option! :) rEalm Mike-E

Thread view Attachments: 0

what to get

2004-02-11 by Peter Websdello

i d say either get a xx-7 and Yamaha a4/5000 sampler, or just an MPC1000. Both options cheaper than a mc909, and better in my opinion. pete. Join Me -

Thread view Attachments: 0

BPM syncronisation device

2004-02-11 by steven_volckaert

I m looking for a device to sync my Command Station with the sound form my turntables. I found such a device, the Redsound Micro Sync, but Redsound stopped

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

Depending on whether you must have multisamples or not, the announced FantomX rack module plus the XX-7 may be a perfect combination of Emu sequencing and

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by Matt Picone

... I have a connection right now to a really hot deal on an expanded Akai Z8. Email me if you want more info. -m@

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-11 by Stu

If you re looking for a sampler/sequencer for studio work, then you can t go wrong with an xx-7 and some sort of rackmounted sampler like an E-MU Ultra (going

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by bluetechnics

Thanks a lot for the extended reply. Since I would use the MC909 mainly for studio work, the portability and live performance factors are not a big issue for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] ES1

2004-02-10 by Turby Schmidt

... i think thats enough, considering that i think of runing the es1 together with the xx7, manual says there are 10 parts one of this parts is a slice part...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Dumb man wants to make trance music...

2004-02-10 by u_ri_p_ui

I ve attached the original German version of my posting to assure that I haven t translated something wrong. Perhaps someone of you can understand German. Hi

Thread view Attachments: 0

My 2 cents' worth about ground-loop hum

2004-02-10 by electrolama

Mike, I suggest that you avoid permanently lifting any grounds if possible. That ground prong is always there for a reason. Although your mileage may vary ,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by Matt Picone

It would save me the (ongoing) trouble of trying to find a sampler to complement my XL-7. Let s talk about this. I noted this week that the Akai MPC-1000 looks

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Yes that is a dumb question, haha. :) Let s put it this way. I used to be huge fan of the mc505 (long before the XX-7 s were a twinkle in Emu s eye), and I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by bluetechnics

Thanks for the input fellas. Given the pros and cons of each unit, which would you ultimately choose (is this a dumb question considering this is an XX-7

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] xl7/esx1

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

You can download the manual from the Korg website BTW. The ESX-1 has no onboard synth, it s is only a sampler. rEalm emuxl7 02/10/2004

Thread view Attachments: 0

xl7/esx1

2004-02-10 by emuxl7

hi , i too, am looking into the esx1 as a sampler to go along w/xl7. i thought i read that it can receive 3 midi channels- is that true? and also is the synth

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] ES1

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Yeah, the ES-1 and the ESX-1 can both play as many samples as there are parts. I think that s like 8 or 10. But you can only play one sample at a time per

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] ES1

2004-02-10 by Turby Schmidt

so that means i can reproduce 2 sample[loop]s at the same time, but it only reproduce one loop or slice at once in a track? ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909\MO BEATS'

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

That s actually insanely useful live though. One of the best things about the XX-7 s is also a weakness to some extent, in that it can create incredibly deep,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: XL 7 vs MC 909\MO BEATS'

2004-02-10 by Mike-E

You better bought a xx-7 and use the difference to buy a seperate sampler and... a new keyboard with a disabled caps lock. The EQ and Compressor are very nice,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] XL 7 vs MC 909\MO BEATS'

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

So you re saying you like it then? rEalm THEY BOTH R HOT, ON THA MC -909 U CAN NOT ONLY SAMPLE BUT U CAN CONTROL VIDEO AND U CAN MASTER YOUR TRACKS ON IT IT

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] XL 7 vs MC 909\MO BEATS'

2004-02-10 by calvin alley

THEY BOTH R HOT, ON THA MC -909 U CAN NOT ONLY SAMPLE BUT U CAN CONTROL VIDEO AND U CAN MASTER YOUR TRACKS ON IT IT HAVE A COMPRESSOR AND EQ ON ALL 16 TRACKS

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] XL 7 vs MC 909

2004-02-10 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

No, I never bought the mc-909 as it, for me, didn t have the ease of use and live power/flexibility as the mc-505. The xl7 is a better all rounder for live use

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [xl7] Re: Sampler SU700/RM1X

2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com

Doh, you re right, sorry. I once again got monophonic and monotimbral mixed up. rEalm Mike-E 02/10/2004 09:08 AM Please respond to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.