RE: [xl7] Re: XL 7 vs MC 909
2004-02-11 by Turby Schmidt
It would be the MPC1k in a ... cant you use the knops of your xx7 to control the external gear? .....
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 223 of 476 · 23793 messages matched
2004-02-11 by Turby Schmidt
It would be the MPC1k in a ... cant you use the knops of your xx7 to control the external gear? .....
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
the quality of Normalization does depend on the software that is being used to Normalize, and of course we all know that in the N process the audio takes a
2004-02-11 by Turby Schmidt
... i never heard anything you did..... _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Do you have fun making music? If so, then stay with it. If you re only doing it for achievements , you re in it for the wrong reasons. It should be fun,
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Hmm, the only thing I could find was this: http://www.behringer.com/02_products/prodindex_dj.cfm?id=DFX69&lang=ENG&CFID=1534616&CFTOKEN=84916988 It ll detect
2004-02-11 by vibesart
I believe that Behringer has just released a copy of the Red Sound BPM detector/sync device (NAMM 2004) ... does. I ... recommend ... quite
2004-02-11 by vibesart
Yo rEalm - another POV on this (my own, altho I am not glued to this method...) the quality of Normalization does depend on the software that is being used to
2004-02-11 by u_ri_p_ui
Hrmph... I ve been playing for over three years. Started with the RM1x, played a little with the Roland D2, experimented with FruityLoops and ended at the
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Mainly I just need a simple tabletop sampler with hands on control of effects and filter. It ll only be for live use triggering simple loops and one shots, so
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
I actually use a MicroSync for the same thing you re trying to do, and like you I couldn t find anything else that came close to what it does. I do know there
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Hey man, you stole my analogy :) rEalm remember j. hendrix didnt know absolutly nothing about musical teory [he didnt pretend to learn playing the guitar in
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Damn Ravi, that s an excellent idea I hadn t considered yet.... thanks. rEalm Depending on whether you must have multisamples or not, the announced FantomX
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Amen! Here s the analogy I use all the time: You wouldn t expect to pick up a guitar and be Hendrix in one week would you? Why would you expect that
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
To be honest, there s really no need to use one (I don t think they even exist). Even though the signal is quiet, you can still normalize it to a hotter level
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Nah, the park near me has power outlets in one section (I call it Studio B). I WISH there was a battery option! :) rEalm Mike-E
2004-02-11 by Peter Websdello
i d say either get a xx-7 and Yamaha a4/5000 sampler, or just an MPC1000. Both options cheaper than a mc909, and better in my opinion. pete. Join Me -
2004-02-11 by steven_volckaert
I m looking for a device to sync my Command Station with the sound form my turntables. I found such a device, the Redsound Micro Sync, but Redsound stopped
2004-02-11 by Turby Schmidt
i dont think its nesecary to understand music in terms of harmony or musical teory, espacialy if we talk about electronic music, of course its nesecary to have
2004-02-11 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
Depending on whether you must have multisamples or not, the announced FantomX rack module plus the XX-7 may be a perfect combination of Emu sequencing and
2004-02-11 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
To further add to this advice: If you do not understand *any* music theory, then you must simply begin to learn it by either getting a keyboard and taking some
2004-02-11 by bluetechnics
It sounds like your trying to make music without wanting to learn the fundamentals. If you want to make music you need to at least learn the basics. Once you
2004-02-11 by Matt Picone
... I have a connection right now to a really hot deal on an expanded Akai Z8. Email me if you want more info. -m@
2004-02-11 by Stu
If you re looking for a sampler/sequencer for studio work, then you can t go wrong with an xx-7 and some sort of rackmounted sampler like an E-MU Ultra (going
2004-02-10 by bluetechnics
Thanks a lot for the extended reply. Since I would use the MC909 mainly for studio work, the portability and live performance factors are not a big issue for
2004-02-10 by Turby Schmidt
... i think thats enough, considering that i think of runing the es1 together with the xx7, manual says there are 10 parts one of this parts is a slice part...
2004-02-10 by u_ri_p_ui
I ve attached the original German version of my posting to assure that I haven t translated something wrong. Perhaps someone of you can understand German. Hi
2004-02-10 by sounddaddy@comcast.net
Sorry about my Oh Boy comment as well... Ditto on the Aaron protection
2004-02-10 by Mike-E
Well THANKS!! That s a good hint. I m going to take a look at these units. The S/PDIF signal isn t suffering from any hum. It s just weak. Does anybody know if
2004-02-10 by Mike-E
... portable ... make some ... Did I miss the battery cover?
2004-02-10 by electrolama
Mike, I suggest that you avoid permanently lifting any grounds if possible. That ground prong is always there for a reason. Although your mileage may vary ,
2004-02-10 by Matt Picone
It would save me the (ongoing) trouble of trying to find a sampler to complement my XL-7. Let s talk about this. I noted this week that the Akai MPC-1000 looks
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Yes that is a dumb question, haha. :) Let s put it this way. I used to be huge fan of the mc505 (long before the XX-7 s were a twinkle in Emu s eye), and I
2004-02-10 by bluetechnics
Thanks for the input fellas. Given the pros and cons of each unit, which would you ultimately choose (is this a dumb question considering this is an XX-7
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
It s all good man, we re just real protective of our Aaron, that s all. No hard feelings... rEalm Stu 02/10/2004 01:04 PM Please respond
2004-02-10 by infradead
thanks!! got to add that to my favorites to share with others.
2004-02-10 by Stu
Sorry to hear of your troubles. Makes me feel like an even bigger idiot now tho... :/ ... From: erik_magrini@Baxter.com [mailto:erik_magrini@Baxter.com] Sent:
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
You can download the manual from the Korg website BTW. The ESX-1 has no onboard synth, it s is only a sampler. rEalm emuxl7 02/10/2004
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Any Strongbad rocks, they need to make a movie... rEalm Aaron Eppolito 02/10/2004 11:31 AM Please respond to xl7 To:
2004-02-10 by emuxl7
hi , i too, am looking into the esx1 as a sampler to go along w/xl7. i thought i read that it can receive 3 midi channels- is that true? and also is the synth
2004-02-10 by Aaron Eppolito
Oh, but the best of all time is by far: http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail45.html ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get
2004-02-10 by Matt Picone
Concerning this email... http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail31.html -m@
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Yeah, the ES-1 and the ESX-1 can both play as many samples as there are parts. I think that s like 8 or 10. But you can only play one sample at a time per
2004-02-10 by Turby Schmidt
so that means i can reproduce 2 sample[loop]s at the same time, but it only reproduce one loop or slice at once in a track? ...
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
That s actually insanely useful live though. One of the best things about the XX-7 s is also a weakness to some extent, in that it can create incredibly deep,
2004-02-10 by Mike-E
You better bought a xx-7 and use the difference to buy a seperate sampler and... a new keyboard with a disabled caps lock. The EQ and Compressor are very nice,
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
So you re saying you like it then? rEalm THEY BOTH R HOT, ON THA MC -909 U CAN NOT ONLY SAMPLE BUT U CAN CONTROL VIDEO AND U CAN MASTER YOUR TRACKS ON IT IT
2004-02-10 by calvin alley
THEY BOTH R HOT, ON THA MC -909 U CAN NOT ONLY SAMPLE BUT U CAN CONTROL VIDEO AND U CAN MASTER YOUR TRACKS ON IT IT HAVE A COMPRESSOR AND EQ ON ALL 16 TRACKS
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Hmmm, I personally wouldn t lift the ground on anything (though the laptop would be my choice over the XL-7). Have your tried a different power strip? rEalm
2004-02-10 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
No, I never bought the mc-909 as it, for me, didn t have the ease of use and live power/flexibility as the mc-505. The xl7 is a better all rounder for live use
2004-02-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Doh, you re right, sorry. I once again got monophonic and monotimbral mixed up. rEalm Mike-E 02/10/2004 09:08 AM Please respond to