Xpantastic!

I would say there is a high possibility that 1.6 is the same as 
1.4..as the matrix had 1.6 and obviously they use the same voice 
boards...

what I would do if I had both files would be to look at the data 
between 1.6 and 1.4 and see if the checksums are the same. If they 
are then they are identical..if not it would be interesting to find 
out the differences.

Phil.




--- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Hmmm,- so what is it doing different compared to 1.4 in a 
Xpander ???
> 
> I´ve found one annoying issue in 1.4 years ago:
> 
> If you are in multi patch mode and have midi CC#7 assigned 
to "Pedal #1" 
> in the midi page,- if you send a program change and a CC#7 offset 
value 
> to the Xpander to change multi-patches w/ the right level,- the 
Xpander 
> shuts down until you move a midi continuous controller pedal or 
slider 
> w/ CC#7 again. This doesn´t appear in single patch mode.
> Is this eventually fixed w/ 1.6 ???
> 
> If yes, are the eprom images available for version 1.6 ?
> Is the eprom chip itself available anymore ?
> Or can someone copy this version 1.6 on a chip for testing 
eventually ?
> I have no Prommer here unfortunally ... :-(
> 
> PeWe
> 
> baumont987 schrieb:
> >
> >
> > As far as I know, with it's 1.6 voice version, my XPander is 
working
> > like a charm, never get a software crash since 5 years.
> >
> > My god, perhaps I'm the only XPander user in the world to have an 
1.6
> > in my XP ;)
> >
> > --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com 
> > <mailto:xpantastic%40yahoogroups.com>, PeWe <ha-pewe@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > processor 1.2 / voice 1.4 and cassette 1.0
> >
> >
>