Hi PeWe, Some random Thoughts: --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote: >Entirely analog synths are manufactured up today, Moog Voyagers,- >the modulars,- and >these can be configurated to be polyphonic, but >this becomes very expensive then,- for >the user ! I can't count how many times I considered duplicating the M12 with a modular and came to the conclusion it just wasn't worth it. --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote: >But it's not impossible to do it, see Doepfer, Cwejman, Synthesis >Technology and some >more exotic small companies,- and they all have >their customers. Why ? Answer: They >keep it small. Yes, but I bet they lose interest. Synthesis technology discontinued their kits. And is now having a subcontractor build the newer modules. B.T.W. Is it not staggering the number of modular synth companies seen on matrixsynth? --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote: > For pros, the price was never the main factor in buying gear or >not,- but swap the >market w/ tons of cheap gear to make >music/noises, - all start to "produce" and the fee >for work In the >music biz goes down, also for the pros. Do you remember when the Korg M1 came out. Suddenly many contemporary musicians ( strings , horns etcÂ…) found themselves out of work. I can remember this causing a union strike or two. --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote: >Meanwhile, the biz is down worldwide and there are tons of (bad) >music for free as also >illegal copies all around ... >Now, we have the situation of much more musicians, less jobs, small >fee but also a >request of more knowledge tech wise and a never >ending learning curve. >"Please do everything imaginable w/ your professor like knowledge >and all your gear, >but don't ask for money. Be happy w/ the credits >you eventually get if the stuff will be >released". That seems to be >the rule today. Yes I agree, I have given up the notion of making any serious money in the biz. --- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, PeWe <ha-pewe@...> wrote: >Kill the pro music biz and you kill the willingness to invest in >high quality gear for a >adequate price which results in a more or >less junk market of electronic noise >generators,- hardware or >software. >90% I see is crap, bad coded or built from cheap parts,- no >reliability at all, no guaranteed >future and all made for the >masses. >On the other side: The crowd is satisfied w/ this, users of gear as >also customers of >music. Yes we have gone in reverse with these crappy MP3 formats. Which makes me pause when considering an apple bit box. I notice the kids would rather spend hours faking it with games like Guitar Hero than to actually learn to play a real instrument. Being a musician does not hold the charm it once did. Now the kids want to be game programmers. A decision most regret when they discover the long hours, low pay, and the shear tedium of testing a game. Karl
Message
Re: Synthesiser audio (musician's) feedback as important as technological brilliance? (theory)
2008-08-25 by Karl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.