--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, marzzz@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 9/30/04 10:06:37 PM, david@... writes: > > > > I had a question for anyone who's got experience with both the CS-80 > > and the MIDIBoard. For me, the best part of the CS-80 is the > > keyboard: the feel, the velocity sensing and the pressure sensing. > > > How best to put this? F#%@^%@ing YES!!!!! Now that I have secured mine, I can > let out the secret: Short of actually owning a mint CS-80, the Kurz MidiBoard > is simply the absolutely best implementation of controlling Poly AT ever > made. The piano touch is good- not quite as good as an A-80 (which I feel was one > of the best, even better than many boards that came after it) but the > MidiBoard has that same spongy "give" that makes it easy to control Poly AT, even if > you are using your 5th digit to bring out one note. > > The only caveat is that the MidiBoard was made for a number of years- there > were three OS revisions, and you DEFINITELY want the latest, 3.0; It is nearly > impossible to update early versions. Looking for some more MIDIBoard knowledge. I just picked up another one last night. It's in very nice condition - a few small scratches. It's very nice driving the CS80 I just added the Kenton MIDI kit to! It appears to have OS version 2.2 since it has 46 parameters. I wonder if anyone knows about the extra parameters. It came with the owners' manual, but it's the same one that my old OS 1 MIDIBoard came with, which only lists 42 parameters. The extra parameters are: 43 After Pressure Mode 0-1 44 Pitch Wheel Mode 0-1(seems to switch direction of wheel) 45 Velocity Map 1-4 46 Pressure Map 1-2 Any ideas? Thanks, David
Message
Re: Kurzweil MIDIboard: poly pressure vs. CS-80
2008-04-04 by David Rogoff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.