Yamaha CS80 group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Yamaha CS80

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Thread

R: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?

R: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?

2011-06-17 by faxiomas@virgilio.it

One new for me too, I'll let it season for 20 years then play it, it should be treated like the great wines ;-)
M

----Messaggio originale----
Da: laurie@...
Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?



----Messaggio originale----
Da: laurie@...
Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?

  




Id love one thanks... can't have too many CS80's
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Quazimodo <noddyspuncture@...>
To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
Date: 06/16/2011 20:14
Subject: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?

Yes, but just like the original Minimoog is still the best (I have three of them!) - the original CS-80 will still be unbeaten (I have two of them!)...;c) 

Cheers, 
TOM 

--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "Mario" <benjamin.marioe1@...> wrote: 
> 
> Is anyone here hoping Yamaha will come out with a new version of the CS-80? 
> 
> Of course, this new version would have to address all the problems associated with the original one. But I do not want to change its weight, though... just what's inside of it, though. 
> 
> I know that Moog has done well with its Minimoog reissues, including the elongated Voyager XL version. 
> 
> ~Ben 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  
  
-->



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

R: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?

2011-06-17 by ostrovitch

Dreaming? Yes.
Hoping? No!!

Yamaha ran into deep digital forever, I couldn't believe they
redo it. And I don't know if they would provide a so amazing keyboard
as on the Mk1.

--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "faxiomas@..." <faxiomas@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> One new for me too, I'll let it season for 20 years then play it, it should be treated like the great wines ;-)
> M
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: laurie@...
> Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
> A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
> Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
> 
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: laurie@...
> Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
> A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
> Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Id love one thanks... can't have too many CS80's
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quazimodo <noddyspuncture@...>
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Date: 06/16/2011 20:14
> Subject: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
> Yes, but just like the original Minimoog is still the best (I have three of them!) - the original CS-80 will still be unbeaten (I have two of them!)...;c) 
> 
> Cheers, 
> TOM 
> 
> --- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "Mario" <benjamin.marioe1@> wrote: 
> > 
> > Is anyone here hoping Yamaha will come out with a new version of the CS-80? 
> > 
> > Of course, this new version would have to address all the problems associated with the original one. But I do not want to change its weight, though... just what's inside of it, though. 
> > 
> > I know that Moog has done well with its Minimoog reissues, including the elongated Voyager XL version. 
> > 
> > ~Ben 
> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>   
>   
> -->
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re : R: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hopin g for a New Version of the CS-80?

2011-06-18 by François Globensky

There will never, ever be anything close to the CS-80 because of the "progress" or evolution. 
Too bad!
le "Doc"

De : ostrovitch <jbond007@atsat.com>
À : yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
Envoyé le : Vendredi 17 Juin 2011 19h01
Objet : R: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?


    
 
Dreaming? Yes.
Hoping? No!!

Yamaha ran into deep digital forever, I couldn't believe they
redo it. And I don't know if they would provide a so amazing keyboard
as on the Mk1.

--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "faxiomas@..." <faxiomas@...> wrote:
>
> One new for me too, I'll let it season for 20 years then play it, it should be treated like the great wines ;-)
> M
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: laurie@...
> Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
> A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
> Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
> 
> 
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: laurie@...
> Data: 17-giu-2011 4.17
> A: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com>
> Ogg: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Id love one thanks... can't have too many CS80's
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quazimodo <noddyspuncture@...>
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Date: 06/16/2011 20:14
> Subject: [yamahacs80] Re: Is Anyone Hoping for a New Version of the CS-80?
> 
> Yes, but just like the original Minimoog is still the best (I have three of them!) - the original CS-80 will still be unbeaten (I have two of them!)...;c) 
> 
> Cheers, 
> TOM 
> 
> --- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "Mario" <benjamin.marioe1@> wrote: 
> > 
> > Is anyone here hoping Yamaha will come out with a new version of the CS-80? 
> > 
> > Of course, this new version would have to address all the problems associated with the original one. But I do not want to change its weight, though... just what's inside of it, though. 
> > 
> > I know that Moog has done well with its Minimoog reissues, including the elongated Voyager XL version. 
> > 
> > ~Ben 
> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -->
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

   
     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.