200e

I've had both. The 260 can function as a basic VCO, and I did do some  
interesting things with it by running its signal through a VCF while  
randomly varying the center frequency. But when I had to get rid of  
one module for space purposes, I decided to keep the 297 and get rid  
of the 260. Ultimately, I found the signal processing of the 297 more  
useful and flexible than the audio capabilities of the 260.

I use the 297 mainly as an signal processor, but you can do some  
interesting effects if you use a phase-shifted audio signal as the  
modulation input to a VCO....



> I have an empty module space I'd like to fill and am considering
> either the 260e Pitchclass Generator or the 297 Infinite Phase Shifter
> - because both have AUDIO as primary path which I am looking for more
> of, and they both seem like like might be fun and simple to play with.
>
> So -- anyone experienced with either of these or have some interesting
> 2 cents to offer?




Richard Lainhart
http://www.otownmedia.com
http://www.downloadplatform.com/richard_lainhart
http://www.vimeo.com/rlainhart
http://www.airglowmusic.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]