200e

I just love the 297

2008/9/21 Richard Lainhart <rlainhart@otownmedia.com>:
> I've had both. The 260 can function as a basic VCO, and I did do some
> interesting things with it by running its signal through a VCF while
> randomly varying the center frequency. But when I had to get rid of
> one module for space purposes, I decided to keep the 297 and get rid
> of the 260. Ultimately, I found the signal processing of the 297 more
> useful and flexible than the audio capabilities of the 260.
>
> I use the 297 mainly as an signal processor, but you can do some
> interesting effects if you use a phase-shifted audio signal as the
> modulation input to a VCO....
>
>
>
>> I have an empty module space I'd like to fill and am considering
>> either the 260e Pitchclass Generator or the 297 Infinite Phase Shifter
>> - because both have AUDIO as primary path which I am looking for more
>> of, and they both seem like like might be fun and simple to play with.
>>
>> So -- anyone experienced with either of these or have some interesting
>> 2 cents to offer?
>
>
>
>
> Richard Lainhart
> http://www.otownmedia.com
> http://www.downloadplatform.com/richard_lainhart
> http://www.vimeo.com/rlainhart
> http://www.airglowmusic.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>