200e

cool. that speaks volumes.



On 21-Sep-08, at 2:13 PM, JB wrote:

> I just love the 297
>
> 2008/9/21 Richard Lainhart <rlainhart@otownmedia.com>:
> > I've had both. The 260 can function as a basic VCO, and I did do  
> some
> > interesting things with it by running its signal through a VCF while
> > randomly varying the center frequency. But when I had to get rid of
> > one module for space purposes, I decided to keep the 297 and get rid
> > of the 260. Ultimately, I found the signal processing of the 297  
> more
> > useful and flexible than the audio capabilities of the 260.
> >
> > I use the 297 mainly as an signal processor, but you can do some
> > interesting effects if you use a phase-shifted audio signal as the
> > modulation input to a VCO....
> >
> >
> >
> >> I have an empty module space I'd like to fill and am considering
> >> either the 260e Pitchclass Generator or the 297 Infinite Phase  
> Shifter
> >> - because both have AUDIO as primary path which I am looking for  
> more
> >> of, and they both seem like like might be fun and simple to play  
> with.
> >>
> >> So -- anyone experienced with either of these or have some  
> interesting
> >> 2 cents to offer?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard Lainhart
> > http://www.otownmedia.com
> > http://www.downloadplatform.com/richard_lainhart
> > http://www.vimeo.com/rlainhart
> > http://www.airglowmusic.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]