Ivo,
Yes, you have a problem. You'll need one wait state (not zero) to use 70ns
memory with a 25MHz '332.
As your tool tells you, zero wait states require 55ns memory or faster.
Fast-Termination mode requires 15ns memory or faster.
For our 25MHz 683xx designs, we use Alliance parts
(http://www.alsc.com/products/fastasync.htm). We always choose a 15nS part
so we can use Fast-Termination cycles. Their stuff works great.
Jeff
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Ivo Strebel" |
| | <Ivo.Strebel@schi|
| | ller.ch> |
| | |
| | 06/24/2004 07:47 |
| | AM |
| | Please respond to|
| | 68300 |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: <68300@yahoogroups.com> |
| cc: |
| Subject: [68300] Memory Access Time |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hello All,
Do I have a problem?
Hardware:
CPU: 68332GCPV25 (it runs at 25MHz)
RAM: 2 * BS62LV2000 (Chip-select access time = (must be)70ns)
Register:
DSACK: 0
Used-Signals:
Databus: D0-15
Adressbus: A1-A18
CS: CS0 (low byte)
CS1 (high byte)
My system is running great, but there is following insecurity:
WS = 0
tcyc=39.7ns
Chip-select access time (MCU Read cycle) = (2+WS) * tcyc * tclsa(max)
-tdicl(min)
Chip-select access time (MCU Read cycle) = 55.4ns
I measured the signal CS0/CS1 several time and the width seems to be stable
at
80 ns (2*tcyc). According to which circumstances will the CS signal be
55.4ns?
Will it ever be? Do I really have to add a wait-state (I am reliant on the
speed).
If the CS0/CS1 drops down under 70ns, I would run in to deep problems.
Which SRAM do you guys use at 25 MHz.
Thx Ivo Strebel
---------------------------------------------------To learn more about
Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
http://www.motorola.com/mcu
learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
http://www.motorola.com/mcu
Yahoo! Groups LinksMessage
Re: [68300] Memory Access Time
2004-06-24 by jeffrey.tenney@gm.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.