Yahoo Groups archive

68300

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:01 UTC

Message

RE: [68300] Make utilities

2002-07-02 by Petar Ristanovic

> Rod --
> 
> Make is normally a component of your development platform.
> 
> I have used:
> 
> 1.  Introl tools (including Make) on my     MC68332 controller product.
> 
> 2.  Various versions of Borland Make for PC based stuff.
> 
> 3.  I am currently using ImageCraft IDE (including Make) on my MC68HC11
> controller product.

  Merants' Configuration Builder (former Polytron make), Microsoft nmake...
Good make utility shall work with your Version Control System...

>     Bob Smith
> 
> 
> ---   Avoid computer viruses, Practice safe hex  ---
> 
> -- Specializing in small, cost effective
>     embedded control systems --
> 
> 
> Robert L. (Bob) Smith
> Smith Machine Works, Inc.
> 9900 Lumlay Road
> Richmond, VA 23236   804/745-1065
> 
>   bobsmith5@...
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Rod.Niner@...>
> To: <68300@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [68300] Make utilities
> 
> 
> > Yes we are using the NT version.  Yes we are pursuing the problems with
> > Opus and they have been helpful when we finally figured out to call them
> > on their order number and not the tech support numbers listed on their web
> > site since they are no longer valid.
> >
> > My question still is what tools are people using other than GNU and Opus?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott A Sumner <sasumner@...>
> > 07/01/2002 05:28 PM
> >
> >
> >         To:     Rod.Niner@...
> >         cc:
> >         Subject:        Re: [68300] Make utilities
> >
> >
> > Rod,
> >
> > Have you tried pursuing the problems via tech support at Opus Software?
> > They have always been very responsive to my queries.  I set up a new
> > build with it under Win2K a couple of weeks ago and had no problems--I
> > did, however, need to switch to the "nt" version of Opusmake rather than
> > the "w95" version.  You may need to purchase the "nt" version to get
> > things to work with xp, as I believe it's much more nt-like than
> > w95-like.
> >
> > As someone suggested, GNU make works and works pretty well, but I think
> > Opus is better overall, and you all have an investment in it, so I would
> > recommend trying to work through the problems.
> >
> > How's things there at GSE?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:21:13 -0400 Rod.Niner@... writes:
> > > I have a general question on what make utilities are in use.  We use
> > > Opus
> > > make but just recently switched to Windows XP and have been
> > > experiencing
> > > plenty of problems.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > 68300-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > To learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
> > > http://www.motorola.com/mcu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 68300-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > To learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
> > http://www.motorola.com/mcu
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 68300-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
> To learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
> http://www.motorola.com/mcu
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.