Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-07 by Zack Widup

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Leon wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "harmon,jr sicat" <hcsicat@yahoo.com>
> To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!
>
>
>> Just curious, Leon i've been reading your messages and something keeps
>> popping up my mind.
>> Are you working for Microchip?
>
> No, but I don't like to see them being slagged off. They make perfectly good
> products. I actually use PICs more these days than AVRs, because they are
> easier to get hold of and Microchip's support is much better than Atmel's,
> and their tools are better.
>
> The wider range of devices means that a closer fit to a particular
> application is generally possible, than with the AVR, in  terms of number of
> pins and features, reducing cost.
>
> Leon
>
>

I have nothing against PIC's either.  To my knowledge, Atmel does not make 
anything comparable to the PIC 10F200.  A 6-pin SMD microcontroller will 
fit in some timy places.  I made a Morse code keyer on a 1/2 inch square 
board (could've even made it smaller!) which can be tacked inside ham 
radio equipment with double-stick tape or what have you.

I do like the AVR architecture better than the Microchip 
architecture.

Zack

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.