What I've read is that this is a hostile take over attempt, because Atmel's board previously rejected the offers from the two companies in pursuit (neither of which actually have the assets to consummate the deal, per the reports). Atmel has been struggling, financially, with turmoil on the board. With the depressed US markets, the Atmel shareholders may either want to wait for recovery (they are all under water), or they want a fire sale to cash-out. For the latter, the dirty trick tactics of going public with this offer is a disgusting attack by greedy people looking to kill competition and fatten the wallets of the company-pairs' executives and shareholders. Then they leave yet another train wreck behind them. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Zack Widup <w9sz@...> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Leon wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "harmon,jr sicat" <hcsicat@...> > > To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:42 AM > > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN! > > > > > >> Just curious, Leon i've been reading your messages and something keeps > >> popping up my mind. > >> Are you working for Microchip? > > > > No, but I don't like to see them being slagged off. They make perfectly good > > products. I actually use PICs more these days than AVRs, because they are > > easier to get hold of and Microchip's support is much better than Atmel's, > > and their tools are better. > > > > The wider range of devices means that a closer fit to a particular > > application is generally possible, than with the AVR, in terms of number of > > pins and features, reducing cost. > > > > Leon > > > > > > I have nothing against PIC's either. To my knowledge, Atmel does not make > anything comparable to the PIC 10F200. A 6-pin SMD microcontroller will > fit in some timy places. I made a Morse code keyer on a 1/2 inch square > board (could've even made it smaller!) which can be tacked inside ham > radio equipment with double-stick tape or what have you. > > I do like the AVR architecture better than the Microchip > architecture. > > Zack >
Message
Re: HOLY crap BATMAN!
2008-10-08 by stevech11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.