AVR-Chat

What I was looking into is putting a magazine together that included similar information that I see in the many sites I am a member of since none of them have a magazine. I would not use info from the sites but from user submission.

Nothing like having something to read while you are on the pot! I still have magazines from 10 years ago! There are many websites out there that can and do contain more information than a magazine can contain. What makes one want a magazine? You can read it anywhere and share it with your friends (no secret, its done).

I have been looking into conception to production and it is alot. Keeping the price down without sponsers will be hard for a new magazine. Membership would cover most of the cost.

My target is AVR projects, articals(how to), advertisements, Selling and wanted ads(limited), some news, reviews, Q & A, Links to websites and so on.

Still doing research,
Brian

I am not promising nothing yet, just looking into it.

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David Kelly <dkelly@...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:18:11PM -0000, ecros_technology wrote:
> > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David Kelly <dkelly@> wrote:
> > >
> > > And how does this differ from AVRfreaks?
> > 
> > Better signal-to-noise ratio?
> 
> That is a worthy goal. I rarely visit AVRfreaks but when looking for
> something specific. Even then the noise usually drowns the signal.
> 
> I think many of the readers, and many of the authors such articles as
> proposed forget that the most value from the story is had from how the
> plot develops and grows. Figure out where one needs to be. Evaluate the
> means to that end. Deal with failures and successes, and know the
> difference between the two.
> 
> An article on how to build a specific item is a lost opportunity. An
> article on how to design that item will be useful on many other projects
> and will not be so specific as to the make and model of CPU.
> 
> -- 
> David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@...
> ========================================================================
> Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
>