AVR-Chat

Studio5 has been the subject of extended discussion on the AVRFreaks web site. 

It has the potential for being pretty good, but there are currently many problems. These problems do seem to be repaired over time, but it  is awfully slow and does NOT give me great confidence. This is somewhat bolstered by the apparent plan to continue updating the version of AVRgcc (to support new devices) in a way that works with Studio4.

Jim Wagner

On Jan 22, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Bruce wrote:

> Jim,
> 
> I am a hobbyist. Been using Studio 4. Upgraded to Studio 5. I 
> was so disappointed
> in 5, that I decided 4 wasn't broken and went back to Studio 4.
> 
> Any idea what the deal with AVR and Studio 5 ? I hope this is not 
> the future.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> On 1/21/2012 11:12 AM, Jim Wagner wrote:
> > This is total rubbish. Studio is fine for programming. Avoid Studio5 and it works very nicely.
> >
> > You WILL need a programming device, such as a Dragon, but that works very well with Studio,
> >
> > Jim Wagner
> > Oregon Research Electronics
> > On Jan 21, 2012, at 1:09 AM, hamidreza maddah wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Avrstudio is not good for programming. i use it for simulate
> >>
> >> --- On Fri, 1/20/12, sania safdar<see_wide_sea@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: sania safdar<see_wide_sea@yahoo.com>
> >> Subject: [AVR-Chat] (unknown)
> >> To: "AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com"<AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Date: Friday, January 20, 2012, 12:35 AM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> kindly some one quide me about atmega88 programing in Avrstudio enviroment
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >>
> >> Sania Safdar
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]