Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: New member.

2006-11-05 by np np

Hi Harry,
   
  I have mostly programmed in asembler and even managed to program a PIC to do multitasking on a dual oven with a 256 * 64 vacuum fluorescent display and rotary encoder inputs. I still have most of the code I wrote for PIC's.
   
  I have done a couple of projects in C as I took over those projects from people who left the company.
   
  I used Delphi quite a bit for programing PC's but more recently got into C#.
  Many of the projects I have done have involved comms to a PC program. I use Microsofts Visual C# as this is a free compiler.
   
  Nigel.
   
  

Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> wrote:
          
Hi Harry,

I think you will find AVR's impressive. In most applications I find they 
have many advantages over PIC's (probably the other most-used RISC
microcontrollers). I find them easier to program and implement. There are 
some instances when I will use a PIC (I don't know of an AVR as small as 
the PIC 10F200, with only 6 pins). But most of my microcontroller 
applications these days are with AVR's.

I personally like to program in AVR assembler. However, if you use C or 
another higher-level language, there are a lot of programs out there (many 
are free) that you ca use. 

Look through the group files on Yahoogroups and also visit 
http://www.arvfreaks.com And have fun!

Zack

On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, harrabylad wrote:

> Sorry did not mean to cause all this trouble.
> 
> The link is put on automaticaly by my emai lsoftware as I use that 
> email address for work.
> 
> I am most certainly interested in AVR's.
> 
> I have removed the link to prevent any future upset.
> 
> I normally ignore all links in other peoples emails.
> 



         

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.