Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 185 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: [AVR-Chat] Messages

2005-10-10 by Dennis

How about "screwed up"? D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Gargano" To: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 10:48 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Messages > Dennis wrote: >> From what I'm seeing in email & responses, there is something akimbo >> with the mail system. > > Hmm, .. h

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Messages

2005-10-10 by Peter Gargano

Dennis wrote: > From what I'm seeing in email & responses, there is something akimbo > with the mail system. Hmm, .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akimbo Dunno about the mail system tho'. Peter .

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-10 by Peter Jakacki

Bi-directional communications with a single LED? Been doing that for years! However to achieve higher speed as a sensor you really need to operate the LED in current mode rather than photo-voltaic mode. This requires something as simple as a single NPN and maybe a pull-up resisto

Thread view Attachments: 0

Messages

2005-10-10 by Dennis

From what I'm seeing in email & responses, there is something akimbo with the mail system. D

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list?

2005-10-10 by David Kelly

On Oct 9, 2005, at 8:08 PM, John Samperi wrote: > Well I have not received any emails since yesterday. > There are quite a few new messages but they haven't come > in ....so this is a test message I guess :-) Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/ and look carefully at the My Groups box.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list?

2005-10-10 by Dennis

Got this one and a copy of my reply. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zack Widup" To: "John Samperi" Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list? > Dunno, I got your message OK. > > I'm sending this both direct to you and via the grou

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list?

2005-10-10 by Zack Widup

Dunno, I got your message OK. I'm sending this both direct to you and via the group. If you get both, then you're still being sent messages by the group. Zack On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, John Samperi wrote: > G'day > > Well I have not received any emails since yesterday. > There are qui

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list?

2005-10-10 by Dennis

Got your request for sympathy. I think you're in. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Samperi" To: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:08 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Am I off the list? > G'day > > Well I have not received any emails since yesterday. > There are quite a few new mes

Thread view Attachments: 0

Am I off the list?

2005-10-10 by John Samperi

G'day Well I have not received any emails since yesterday. There are quite a few new messages but they haven't come in ....so this is a test message I guess :-) Getting withdrawals symptoms, no emails...no AVFREAKS Regards John Samperi ********************************************

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-09 by fjch100

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "fjch100" wrote: > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, erikc wrote: > > > > fjch100 wrote: > > > HI, I just upload a new pdf file with information about using > normal > > > LEDs like sensor to interchange information between modules. > > > I just

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-09 by fjch100

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, erikc wrote: > > fjch100 wrote: > > HI, I just upload a new pdf file with information about using normal > > LEDs like sensor to interchange information between modules. > > I just found it surfing the web, but I feel the need to share with all >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-09 by James Hatley

try 'U' ( single quotes ) Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron" To: Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 1:46 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar() > I'm attempting to use the Codevision compiler with a tiny2313. > Unfortunately its been 7 years since I took C, so I'm qu

Thread view Attachments: 0

codevision putchar()

2005-10-09 by Aaron

I'm attempting to use the Codevision compiler with a tiny2313. Unfortunately its been 7 years since I took C, so I'm quite rusty... While I wait for the moderator of the codevisionavr group to approve my membership, I will post my question here. :) If I write: putchar (0x55) ; tr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Intercom using single LED

2005-10-09 by erikc

fjch100 wrote: > HI, I just upload a new pdf file with information about using normal > LEDs like sensor to interchange information between modules. > I just found it surfing the web, but I feel the need to share with all > the AVR comunity. I may be some one can write a driver i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Remote STK500

2005-10-09 by Robert Moro

I want use my STK500 on a half duplex RF-link. Is this possible? Does anybody have experience with this?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Intercom using single LED

2005-10-09 by fjch100

HI, I just upload a new pdf file with information about using normal LEDs like sensor to interchange information between modules. I just found it surfing the web, but I feel the need to share with all the AVR comunity. I may be some one can write a driver in GCC to just include a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Avrfreaks down??

2005-10-08 by John Samperi

G'day It looks like the site is down or hit by another worm/virus. Any of the pages come up with lots of errors and no picures. Warning: main(./modules/PNphpBB2/includes/constants.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/www/data-dist/modules/PNphpBB2/

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Avrfreaks down??

2005-10-08 by Geert De Pecker

There seems to be a problem indeed. Maybe somebody doing an upgrade. If not... John Samperi wrote: > G'day > > It looks like the site is down or hit by another worm/virus. > Any of the pages come up with lots of errors and no picures. > > Warning: main(./modules/PNphpBB2/includes

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio - line numbers

2005-10-07 by Geert De Pecker

Neither works. I downloaded the latest rc today, but still the same problem. F4 just takes you to the next line. Larry Barello wrote: > Double click & F4 are supposed to work. Notify avr@atmel.com that they > broke it. This is a terrible bug since everything else is so great (it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AT90CAN128

2005-10-07 by Thomas Keller

*sigh* OK. I suppose now I am going to have to go and read every data sheet on Atmel's website, so I don't stick my foot in my mount again like this. Query: are these PLLs used with external crystal or clock sources to multiply the clock frequency, or are they there for other pur

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] AT90CAN128

2005-10-07 by Thomas Keller

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 17:11 -0700, Larry Barello wrote: One of these days I am going to learn not to shoot from the hip, as it were. *blush* I sit corrected (if you think I check my email while standing, think again!) Tom > Not true. Look at the tiny26 oscillator circuit. They do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-07 by Thomas Keller

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 10:10 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > Thomas Keller wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:00 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > >>Don wrote: > >>>Eduardo Munoz wrote: > >>>>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. > >>A 48Mhz AVR now that is nice (I wonder how hi

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio - line numbers

2005-10-07 by Larry Barello

Double click & F4 are supposed to work. Notify avr@atmel.com that they broke it. This is a terrible bug since everything else is so great (it worked properly in earlier beta's). ----------- Larry Barello www.barello.net | -----Original Message----- | From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.co

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio - line numbers

2005-10-07 by Geert De Pecker

Roy, That is what I tried to do, but nothing moves. I assume this will only work when eidting an assembler program and not a C program. At this moment, I would already be happy with the line numbers displayed. Impossible to debug otherwise. Geert Roy E. Burrage wrote: > Double cl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-07 by Geert De Pecker

Zack, Seems ok. AVR Studio will first ask to do the upgrade. I had no problems (on ATTiny26). Geert Zack Widup wrote: > > I was wondering how the new version of AVRStudio worked with the STK500. > I downloaded it yesterday and installed it last night but haven't tried it > yet wi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-07 by Russell Shaw

Thomas Keller wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:00 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > >>Don wrote: >> >>>Eduardo Munoz wrote: >>> >>>>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. >> >>A 48Mhz AVR now that is nice (I wonder how high our clock will go, >>without liquid nitrogen cooling

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-07 by Kathy Quinlan

Thomas Keller wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:00 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > >>Don wrote: >> >>>Eduardo Munoz wrote: >>> >>>>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. >> >>A 48Mhz AVR now that is nice (I wonder how high our clock will go, >>without liquid nitrogen cooling

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] AT90CAN128

2005-10-07 by Larry Barello

Not true. Look at the tiny26 oscillator circuit. They don't use a 32khz clock for the PLL source, however. ----------- Larry Barello www.barello.net | -----Original Message----- | From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf | Of Thomas Keller | Sent

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AT90CAN128

2005-10-06 by Hugo Oliveira

Hi Tom, AT90PWM3, does have a PLL, It is used for the CPU clock and for the PSC (PWM controllers). Regards Hugo On 10/6/05, Thomas Keller wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 17:43 +0100, David Collier wrote: > > If I run this chip off a 32KHz XTAL.. does it multiply up internally, > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AT76C713 Availability

2005-10-06 by Eduardo Munoz

Yes, we are developing devices using these parts now . . . Don wrote: > Eduardo Munoz wrote: > >>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. Are these AT76C713 devices available in the wild yet in tray qty or less? Cheers Don Yahoo! for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-06 by Thomas Keller

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:00 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > Don wrote: > > Eduardo Munoz wrote: > >>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. > A 48Mhz AVR now that is nice (I wonder how high our clock will go, > without liquid nitrogen cooling ;) Actually, heat isn't the limtin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AT90CAN128

2005-10-06 by Thomas Keller

On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 17:43 +0100, David Collier wrote: > If I run this chip off a 32KHz XTAL.. does it multiply up internally, > or does it actually RUN at 32KHz??? AVR microprocessors do not contain PLLs in their clock circuitry. They run at whatever frequency the clock is runn

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-06 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Don Kinzer" wrote: > I sure wish I could find a way to make it not always start > maximized. It would be best if it would save the position and > size upon exit and restore it on the next execution. Either I overlooked it before or it was just ad

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-06 by Ralph Hilton

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:00:42 -0500 (CDT) you wrote: > >I was wondering how the new version of AVRStudio worked with the STK500. >I downloaded it yesterday and installed it last night but haven't tried it >yet with the STK500. > >Any problems? You'll have to update the STK500 firmw

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-06 by Zack Widup

Thanks Larry. I have a few chips to program and I'll try it out later today. Zack On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Larry Barello wrote: > I used studio 4.12 with an old STK500 (I didn't want to upgrade because I > was importing old makefiles using AvrDude) and it seemed to work ok. The > only

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-06 by Larry Barello

I used studio 4.12 with an old STK500 (I didn't want to upgrade because I was importing old makefiles using AvrDude) and it seemed to work ok. The only problem is the nasty dialog box saying it might not work without upgrading. ----------- Larry Barello www.barello.net | -----Ori

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-06 by Zack Widup

I was wondering how the new version of AVRStudio worked with the STK500. I downloaded it yesterday and installed it last night but haven't tried it yet with the STK500. Any problems? Zack On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Geert De Pecker wrote: > Dennis, > > Yes I did. The board works ok becau

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio - line numbers

2005-10-06 by Roy E. Burrage

Double click on the error line. REB Geert De Pecker wrote: I don't know if it was available in the older avr studio versions, but is there a possibility to have line numbers displayed in the editor window? When compiling a C program, I was used in programmers notepad to select th

Thread view Attachments: 0

[AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio - line numbers

2005-10-06 by Geert De Pecker

I don't know if it was available in the older avr studio versions, but is there a possibility to have line numbers displayed in the editor window? When compiling a C program, I was used in programmers notepad to select the error and the editor jumped to the line containing the er

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-06 by Geert De Pecker

Dennis, Yes I did. The board works ok because I can upload to the stk500 when selecting the hex file manually. Dennis wrote: > Did you upgrade the dev board? I installed the upgrade and had no problem > although the software is a bit more "clunky" as far as program response. > D

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-06 by Don Ingram

Kathy Quinlan wrote: > Don wrote: > > >>Eduardo Munoz wrote: >> >> >>>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. >> >> >> >>Are these AT76C713 devices available in the wild yet in tray qty or less? >> >>Cheers >> >>Don > > > I WANT :) Settle Petal! Back in the queue > > A 48Mhz

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-06 by Kathy Quinlan

Don wrote: > Eduardo Munoz wrote: > >>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. > > > > Are these AT76C713 devices available in the wild yet in tray qty or less? > > Cheers > > Don I WANT :) A 48Mhz AVR now that is nice (I wonder how high our clock will go, without liquid nitr

Thread view Attachments: 0

AT76C713 Availability

2005-10-06 by Don

> Eduardo Munoz wrote: > >>I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. Are these AT76C713 devices available in the wild yet in tray qty or less? Cheers Don

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-05 by Dennis

Did you upgrade the dev board? I installed the upgrade and had no problem although the software is a bit more "clunky" as far as program response. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geert De Pecker" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR

Thread view Attachments: 0

wire-or of AT90CAN128 port pins.

2005-10-05 by David Collier

I assume I can use pins in input mode as wire-ored open-emitter-style outputs by enabling and disabling the pull-ups? Will a 200K pull-down be about right, assuming no nasty loading/leakage elsewhere? David

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] FW: Atmel New AVR Studio 4.12

2005-10-05 by Eduardo Munoz

I tried it with At76c713DK and JtagIce MkII. The first thing that it did was demand upgrade of MkII firmware. Allowed it to upgrade MkII firmware. Afterward it was impossible to get it to recognize the target/load file as a valid combination. We use IAR compiler and I suspect the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-05 by Dennis

You can use avr@atmel.com. Response is usually pretty slow though. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Samperi" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:53 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio > At 06:04 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote: >>flash memory", the upload takes a frac

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-05 by Geert De Pecker

I've put it on the forum. John Samperi wrote: > At 06:04 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote: > >flash memory", the upload takes a fraction of a second: not good > >(and it doesn't work...). There is also no error message of any kind. > > > >When uploading the generated hex file with "Input

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] New AVR Studio

2005-10-05 by John Samperi

At 06:04 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote: >flash memory", the upload takes a fraction of a second: not good >(and it doesn't work...). There is also no error message of any kind. > >When uploading the generated hex file with "Input Hex file", >it functions properly. > >Any ideas ? Let At

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.