Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 184 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-19 by John Samperi

At 11:08 AM 19/10/2005, you wrote: > i like it's neat-ness Unlike my workshop or brain for that matter :-) >It could be nicer if you put in some application notes using one of >your modules. The update site will have a download page where there will be circuit diagrams of some mo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-19 by Astria Nur Irfansyah

Your site looks pretty much okay, in fact i like it's neat-ness and simplicity :p Good on ya :) It could be nicer if you put in some application notes using one of your modules. Think of it as another form of promotion :D All the best. On 10/19/05, John Samperi wrote: > At 10:01

Thread view Attachments: 0

eclipse and avr-gcc?

2005-10-19 by Dennis Clark

Hi all, I must admit that I'm spoiled on using an IDE for my development. I used to do everything the "three window" method, even java, but after using even indifferent IDE's I admit to liking the organization. I found the Eclipse project and downloaded that and the C/C++ IDE fea

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-19 by John Samperi

At 10:01 AM 19/10/2005, you wrote: >Yeah get rid of the moto CRAP !!!!! They all have AVR substitutes now :-) The CONT2 is still in use as I haven't ported the code across to the new CONT3 module which uses the M64 (or M128). The MTERM1 has changed to MTERM2 using a M8 and it com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-19 by Kathy Quinlan

John Samperi wrote: > G'day all > > Thanks for the feedback both here and off list. > I have now moved our domain name to the new site > so the address below should work. > > Now for the task of making the website 100% Atmel :-) > > Regards > > John Samperi Yeah get rid of the mo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-18 by John Samperi

G'day all Thanks for the feedback both here and off list. I have now moved our domain name to the new site so the address below should work. Now for the task of making the website 100% Atmel :-) Regards John Samperi ****************************************************** Ampertron

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-18 by Geert De Pecker

Looks ok here (old mozilla) John Samperi wrote: > G'day all > > Well it seems that nothing much is happening here > so I thought I'd ask a favour :-) > > I'm in the progress of changing over ISP, YES I have > finally got broadband (just in time to download AVR > Studio 4.12 :-) )

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-18 by John Samperi

At 08:21 PM 18/10/2005, you wrote: >Looks fine to me mate :) It seems that the main page had an extra pty ltd in the upper left hand side. It was a corrupted file and have since uploaded a good file. Received the mail from the website too. I should be able to point our domain nam

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [OT} A favour please

2005-10-18 by Kathy Quinlan

John Samperi wrote: > G'day all > > Well it seems that nothing much is happening here > so I thought I'd ask a favour :-) > > I'm in the progress of changing over ISP, YES I have > finally got broadband (just in time to download AVR > Studio 4.12 :-) ) my previous ISP could not p

Thread view Attachments: 0

[OT} A favour please

2005-10-18 by John Samperi

G'day all Well it seems that nothing much is happening here so I thought I'd ask a favour :-) I'm in the progress of changing over ISP, YES I have finally got broadband (just in time to download AVR Studio 4.12 :-) ) my previous ISP could not provide ADSL as I was too far away fr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Where can I buy a STK500 in San Jose or Bay Area (n/t)?

2005-10-17 by James Hatley

Hello, I don't know anything about your area but on the net the easiest is http://www.digikey.com they have the STK500 and all sorts of Atmel parts and equipment. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: &wmarini To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 1:56 PM S

Thread view Attachments: 0

[FOR SALE] WAVE SOLDERING MACHINE

2005-10-17 by Darren Worley

Hi Russell, Here is my direct email : darren@worley.org.au Or feel free to phone me on my mobile 0412285264 (oh and I changed the topic to fixup my last .bad ;) /~darren -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Russe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR Ethernet ICs

2005-10-17 by Russell Shaw

Darren Worley wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I know it’s a fair way off topic, but maybe, just maybe someone can pick > up a bargain, and put it to good use. I’m closing our factory (client > went off shore) and selling our Wave Soldering Machine, it’s a SEHO > Lotanlagen 8020/8040… It’d

Thread view Attachments: 0

[FOR SALE] WAVE SOLDERING MACHINE

2005-10-17 by Darren Worley

OOPS ! Bugger, forgot to change the TOPIC after a ‘reply’.. silly me.. sorry all, anyway, I hope someone can benefit from our misfortune… From: Darren Worley [mailto:darren@worley.org.au] Sent: Monday, 17 October 2005 12:21 PM To: 'AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] AVR Ethernet ICs

2005-10-17 by Darren Worley

Hi Guys, I know it’s a fair way off topic, but maybe, just maybe someone can pick up a bargain, and put it to good use. I’m closing our factory (client went off shore) and selling our Wave Soldering Machine, it’s a SEHO Lotanlagen 8020/8040… It’d be so sad to see such a good mach

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AVR and ethernet.....

2005-10-16 by kernels_nz

Hi Ben, Thank you very much, that information is fantastic, will do a proper read-through tonite. cheers HB --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bzijlstra" wrote: > > Hein > > Not exactly what you are looking for but AVR and Ethernet can be found on my > homepage. > > Have fun > Ben

Thread view Attachments: 0

AVR and ethernet.....

2005-10-16 by bzijlstra

Hein Not exactly what you are looking for but AVR and Ethernet can be found on my homepage. Have fun Ben Zijlstra http://members.home.nl/bzijlstra > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:44:25 -0000 > From: "kernels_nz" > Subject: AVR Ethernet ICs > > Hi Guys, > > Has anyone had

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: USB galvanic separation

2005-10-16 by kernels_nz

Hi there, There are a few basic ways to achieve galvanic signal isolation. Ive had some good results with wide band optocouplers used for video signal isolation in televisions. Cheers Hein B --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Q boll" wrote: > > Hi All, > > I need to make a USB gal

Thread view Attachments: 0

AVR Ethernet ICs

2005-10-16 by kernels_nz

Hi Guys, Has anyone had any experience with Atmel's range of ethernet devices ? Id like to know how hard it is to get a datalogger up and running that hosts it's own web page. Cheers Hein B

Thread view Attachments: 0

Changing ISP please ignore...if you can

2005-10-14 by John Samperi

G'day Just changing over to a broadbeans ISP (or is it broadband) and doing some testing Regards John Samperi ****************************************************** Ampertronics Pty. Ltd. 11 Brokenwood Place Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153 AUSTRALIA Tel. (02) 9674-6495 Fax (02) 9674-874

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Remote STK500

2005-10-14 by Brian Dean

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:53:45PM +0200, Robert Moro wrote: > I want use my STK500 on a half duplex RF-link. Is this possible? Does > anybody have experience with this? I've done this, sorta. I used a pair of MaxStream 9XCite 900 MHz 9600 baud wireless modules for the link. I di

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-12 by Russell Shaw

erikc wrote: > Kathy Quinlan wrote: > >>Thomas Keller wrote: > > [===] > >>> I would like to note that I was not challanging Peter on that issue, >>>I honestly didn't understant the notation, just as I didn't understand >>>his schematic notation. >>> >>>Tom >> >>This is not so mu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by erikc

Kathy Quinlan wrote: > Thomas Keller wrote: [===] >> I would like to note that I was not challanging Peter on that issue, >>I honestly didn't understant the notation, just as I didn't understand >>his schematic notation. >> >>Tom > > > This is not so much a "British" thing as a "

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Peter Jakacki

Hi Tom, Don't get us Peters mixed up now! (look at the column that says "Sender") :) I could of attached a nice little schematic but that would of been filtered out and so we are left with either a link to a webpage or inline ascii schematics. I'm only trying to be helpful but I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Thomas Keller

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 08:54 -0700, Dave Hylands wrote: > > "R" is the color red, so what is the 100 supposed to indicate? > I've never before seen color used in a circuit description. There is > no common electrical unit I am aware of that is designated by an "R" > in that manner

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Zack Widup

I have seen this notation used on quite a few schematics lately, most coming from Germany or Japan. I figured it meant just what you noted, Kat. In the same drawings I've seen notations like 2R7 and 0R27, etc. Zack On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > > This is not so much

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Dave Hylands

> "R" is the color red, so what is the 100 supposed to indicate? I've > never before seen color used in a circuit description. There is no > common electrical unit I am aware of that is designated by an "R" in > that manner. Is this more of your view of "being practical?" The lin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Kathy Quinlan

Thomas Keller wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 16:01 +1000, John Samperi wrote: > >>At 03:14 PM 11/10/2005, you wrote: >> >>>Shall we move on to British "earth" versus US "ground"? >> >>I believe 100R or whatever is an international standard >>and has been so for a long time (20 ye

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Thomas Keller

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 16:01 +1000, John Samperi wrote: > At 03:14 PM 11/10/2005, you wrote: > >Shall we move on to British "earth" versus US "ground"? > I believe 100R or whatever is an international standard > and has been so for a long time (20 years??) Ok that is possible, and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Thomas Keller

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 12:35 +1000, Peter Gargano wrote: > Thomas Keller wrote: > > Also, what does 100R indicate? > Tell me that's a trick question! > In case it's not, here's the first thing Google picked up! > 35 years, huh? I've always been confrontational, but you really take

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by John Samperi

At 03:14 PM 11/10/2005, you wrote: >Shall we move on to British "earth" versus US "ground"? I believe 100R or whatever is an international standard and has been so for a long time (20 years??) Regards John Samperi ****************************************************** Ampertronic

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by stevech

In the US, history says a resistor less than 1000 ohms is written as just a number. No "R". I suppose you can find examples in the US such as 1R5 for 1.5 ohms; not sure. Shall we move on to British "earth" versus US "ground"? -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Peter Gargano

Thomas Keller wrote: > Also, what does 100R indicate? Tell me that's a trick question! In case it's not, here's the first thing Google picked up! http://www.lalena.com/audio/electronics/color/ 35 years huh? Peter .

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-11 by Thomas Keller

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 08:23 +1000, Peter Jakacki wrote: > The circuit notation is obvious if you have ever wired a circuit up > before, otherwise you may find it a bit terse. The "~~ 10K ~~" means a > 10K resistor with the connections on either end, BASE means connection > to the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-10 by Ralph Hilton

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:34:09 -0400 you wrote: >Ralph Hilton wrote: > >>>On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:46 -0400, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> >>>>if I write: >>>> putchar ("U") ; transmit ascii U out the serial port >>>>it throws a "possible loss of precision" warning and actually >>>>transmit

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-10 by Peter Jakacki

I think you guys miss the point of single LED wireless coms. It is only intended for a very short distance such as when an operator stands in front of the instrument etc. Sure, I've used the IR receiver's before but that is another kettle of fish altogether and not really suitabl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-10 by Dave Hylands

Hi Aaron, > Not that it really matters, but how does "U" evaluate to 0x38? Since "U" is a string, the value passed on the stack will be the pointer to that string. 0x38 is the portion of the pointer that's interpreted as the character to print. -- Dave Hylands Vancouver, BC, Cana

Thread view Attachments: 0

Looking for cheap pulse motor controller

2005-10-10 by Timothy D. Lenz

I am expermenting with Muller style pulse motor/generators and wan to use amicro to control the pulses. Atmel looks like they have the cheapest easyest to use devices. It would get a signal from an optic sensor each time any magnet passes TDC and one of the pulses will also be on

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-10 by Aaron

Ralph Hilton wrote: >>On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:46 -0400, Aaron wrote: >> >> >>>if I write: >>> putchar ("U") ; transmit ascii U out the serial port >>>it throws a "possible loss of precision" warning and actually >>>transmits >>>ascii 8. >>>What am I missing? >>> >>> > >"U" is a

Thread view Attachments: 0

[bascom] USB galvanic separation?

2005-10-10 by Q boll

Hi All, I need to make a USB galvanic separation because the groundloop gives problems when testing my USB product. Does anyone have any experience of how to do this? I looked on the internet but I didn't found anything usefull. Thanks for the help, Pascal Peters

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-10 by Ralph Hilton

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:34:52 -0500 you wrote: >On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:46 -0400, Aaron wrote: >> I'm attempting to use the Codevision compiler with a tiny2313. >> While I wait for the moderator of the codevisionavr group to approve >> my membership, I will post my question here.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-10 by stevech@san.rr.com

this seems to wire an (infrared) LED to an output bit. And a photosensitive diode to the input port of a different micro. Well, this is OK if (a) the receiver diode is never near light/sunlight and (b) the intended range is very short. A practical system would not use a simple di

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Intercom using single LED

2005-10-10 by Thomas Keller

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 12:28 +1000, Peter Jakacki wrote: > I call it my 20 cent wireless coms. > Basic circuit connections:- > GND ~~ [LED- LED+] ~~ 10K ~~ BASE > LED+] ~~ 100R ~~ OUTPUT PORT ( or use a PNP for more > drive or if using a UART ) > VDD ~~ PULL-UP ~~ COLLECTOR ~~ INP

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] codevision putchar()

2005-10-10 by Thomas Keller

On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:46 -0400, Aaron wrote: > I'm attempting to use the Codevision compiler with a tiny2313. > While I wait for the moderator of the codevisionavr group to approve > my membership, I will post my question here. :) > If I write: > putchar (0x55) ; transmit asci

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Avrfreaks down??

2005-10-10 by Thomas Keller

John: Weldcome to my world! *grin* Seriously, I think you'd best consider contacting yourt ISP about possible problems with their mail server. Tom On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 17:34 +1000, John Samperi wrote: > G'day > > Seems to be still down :-( :'( but my email seems to > be tricklin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] [bascom] USB galvanic separation?

2005-10-10 by Jim Wagner

What is happening? Jim On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:44:18 +0200 "Q boll" wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to make a USB galvanic separation because > the groundloop gives problems when testing my USB > product. > > Does anyone have any experience of how to do this? I > looked > on the inter

Thread view Attachments: 0

Avrfreaks down??

2005-10-10 by John Samperi

G'day Seems to be still down :-( :'( but my email seems to be trickling through now....so yes this is another test, ......it's sad when one has to send emails to oneself. Regards John Samperi ****************************************************** Ampertronics Pty. Ltd. 11 Brokenw

Thread view Attachments: 0

USB galvanic separation

2005-10-10 by Q boll

Hi All, I need to make a USB galvanic separation because the groundloop gives problems when testing my USB product. Does anyone have any experience of how to do this? I looked on the internet but I didn't found anything usefull. Thanks for the help, Pascal Peters

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.