Josh I believe that this has been mentioned before, but consider using a member of the Atari ST family of computers. There were several CZ editors that worked GREAT! Optionally there is software emulation of the Atari ST family using STEem on a PC (http://tamw.atari-users.net/steem.htm). In either case, you can get several different CZ editors that are now public domain and they are well worth the time to get. Check out Tim's Atari MIDI World (http://tamw.atari-users.net/timidi.htm) for a raft of down loadable software, including the Hybrid Arts CZ editor. Larry T. --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Josh" <basicj@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the replies. It's not that programming them is hard > per-se, but it is time consuming compared to the analogue & virtual > analogues I'm used to. Programming a sound is, as you say, easy, but > getting the most out of the three filter envelopes per DCO is a bit of > a chore. I might come up with an okay sound by manually programming > it, where I could come up with something far greater if I had software > control, where all the parameters are visible at once. Even if I have > to change paramters then load the entire patch. > > Anyway, now that I know, I'll just have to soldier on ;) I imagine > I'll get used to it. It does sound nice. > > Cheers, > -Josh > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Summa" <flotorian@> wrote: > > > > Afaik the complete patch has to be send on every parameter change, > > what makes realtime or knob control via sysex virtually impossible... > > >
Message
Re: The wackiness of CZ sysex
2007-09-14 by Larry T.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.