On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, synergeezer wrote:
> I don't think of PD as dead, with used instruments constantly available.
> It's true that PD, in the CZ sense, is not being developed, anymore.
==================
is it being developed in any sense? even with a K5000 and FS1r, i can't
bring myself to get rid of my CZ1... but i'd get rid of it in a hurry if i
could replace it with a rackmount unit.
> But, fairly recently, Yamaha made the FS1R (16 operators, OK 8+8), which
> I have not plunged into programming, yet, but the presets are worth
> current cost.
===================
you seem to know your way around the DX/TX/CZ/VZ range of synthesizers,
and you mentioned that you have a VZ and several CZs.
i had a VZ but it's gone, now :(
i'm thinking about replacing it, not so much because i miss it as such,
but it crossed my mind that (despite the general consensus) it might
actually be possible to emulate a CZ with it. lemme get your opinion on
this... if a patch only uses one carrier (sine) and one modulator
([co]sine or other waveform), can't it emulate a CZ? it's been a while
since i programmed a VZ, but i remember a lot of limitations... like each
carrier/modulator pair shares a lot of the same parameters. anyway, what's
your opinion on that? the CZ1 is great, but it's just such a huge heavy
fscking tank.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"That's George Washington, the first President, of course. The
interesting thing about him is that I read three -- three or
four books about him last year. Isn't that interesting?"
-- George "dubya" Bush, 5 May 2006
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/05/20060507-2.htmlMessage
Re: [CZsynth] Re: CZ-Synthesis
2008-04-21 by Atom Smasher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.