i know, i don't really get it either... this really maybe doesn't have much to do with the original question of whether it's ok to download mp3's without paying for them. but i guess my answer is that it seems like fads are cycling ever faster and faster. (remember electroclash? remember dancehall?) and maybe that's because there's no huge stylistic shifts to break that circle?? hm actually you're right, that's all bullshit. i simply don't understand what kids listen to, and that's the end of it. On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:54 PM, zoinky420 <zoinky420@...> wrote: > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "ezra buchla" <ezra.buchla@...> wrote: >> >>> at the same time, i think in recent years i've started seeing some of >> the fallout of that ubiquity in the form of shorter and shorter >> attention spans, shorter and shorter fad-cycles in "underground" >> music, more derivation, less actual originality. > > By the way, that sounds like a total contradiction. If people have > shorter attention spans, that should foster change quicker. If fads > are cycling faster, that would be because of more originality. How > could the same unoriginal stuff keep entertaining people with short > attention spans? Short attention spans should make culture evolve more > quickly. And short attention spans of consumers would be a good thing > for creators of entertainment content, since it means that, inspite of > the tools being democratized, consumers' short attention spans prevent > them from having the patience to create their own entertainment, thus, > they must rely on obtaining their entertainment from people who's > attention spans are long enough to be able to create content. > >
Message
Re: [CZsynth] Re: music economics
2008-08-11 by ezra buchla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.