--- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "zoinky420" <zoinky420@...> wrote: >> i > > still think they're n interesting example of a band as a money- > making > > machine that is really trying to duck and weave with the changing > > landscape... they are actually giving away high quality downloads of > > the new record with no expectation of any compensation. so naturally > > this is a fvorite example if you want to show that people can be > > successful pro musicians in a context of total loss of recording > > profit. to which my response is usually that they wouln't be able to > > do that now if they hadn't sold so many records in 1994. > > > > Great, now if only you could quit trying to argue both sides by > pointing out that you said 'this' after your paragraph about 'that' > was refuted. > Sorry, although my statement still stands, in this particular case I did not read the last sentence of your paragraph, and os I did not respond to this particular paragraph very well, which I will now attempt to remedy. >to which my response is usually that they wouln't be able to >do that now if they hadn't sold so many records in 1994. To which my response is that they would not have sold so many records in 1994 if people like me, college radio DJs, and nightclub DJs, had not been hyping and spinning their record in 1990. Unfortunately, relying on your understanding of your own motivations most likely, you thought I was trying to brag about having been into Nine Inch Nails 18 years ago. When in fact, what I have been trying to convey is that in my opinion the same machinations that made NIN popular enough in 1990 to be able to become a massive commercial success in 1994, are still available to any other artist capable of recording an album as prescient and groundbreaking as NIN's first album.
Message
Re: waldorf microwave vs CZ & poly-8
2008-08-11 by zoinky420
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.