--- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "zoinky420" <zoinky420@...> wrote: > To which my response is that they would not have sold so many records > in 1994 if people like me, college radio DJs, and nightclub DJs, had > not been hyping and spinning their record in 1990. Unfortunately, > relying on your understanding of your own motivations most likely, you > thought I was trying to brag about having been into Nine Inch Nails 18 > years ago. When in fact, what I have been trying to convey is that in > my opinion the same machinations that made NIN popular enough in 1990 > to be able to become a massive commercial success in 1994, are still > available to any other artist capable of recording an album as > prescient and groundbreaking as NIN's first album. > And by the way, as I mentioned earlier, NIN's first album was a sleeper that was only enjoying success in nightclubs for two years before it finally charted. For those of us who knew about it before it charted, it was a somewhat special record. It sounded like nothing else out there, and clearly had more of a chance to make a dent in the mainstream than Ministry did. So we hyped it, we wanted the rest of the world to know about NIN. And like I said, most of us were on to other things by 1994, and more than a few of us, including myself, made fun of NIN and the posers who liked them. So if you don't understand what I'm trying to say about the way good bands become a success, you've missed the boat entirely on any understanding of the structure of pop culture. In those days, people didn't walk into record stores to buy product from acts they'd never heard of. People walked into record stores and bought product from acts they'd heard on the radio, or spun at nightclubs. Now they buy product from acts they've heard mp3s of and they don't need to trek to the record store to do so. There may be a slight shift in the make-up of the winners and losers, but no more so than in any other minor infrastructure shift in the industry (for example, when CDs were first marketed, classical and jazz recordings got a big boost in sales because most people buying CDs were trying to buy 'quality' sound. Rock & Roll and pop music was not seen as the market for CDs at that time, so CDs of those genres were not marketed at all. Obviously their sales suffered)
Message
Re: waldorf microwave vs CZ & poly-8
2008-08-11 by zoinky420
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.