Hi they are indeed similar, reading out a sine table and vary readout speed to stretch or clinch the resulting waveform. I had a look at the patents Yamaha held on this technique.... What Yamaha calls FM originaly is Phase Modulation, the difference between FM and PM is, that FM is influencing the read out speed of this table steadily and Phase Modulation does this only as long as the modulating waveforms is changing. As far as I know, when it comes to the CZ, Casio is using those readouts to create Waveshapers instead of Oscillators, it's possible to do similar things with newer FM-Synth by tuning fixed oscillators down to 0Hz... When it comes to iPD, I created a little (unfinished) conversion tutorial that explains how to convert sounds between DX and VZ Synths, you should find it in the files section of this group. ...Summa On 28 Sep 2010 at 12:31, cliffe123 wrote: > It said that yamaha started to sue casio because the synth methods > are both simular. IMO they are both rather different (FM and iPD). > Is it possibly casio can reappeal and counter-sue yamaha twenty > something years later if they wanted too? I know they both hate each > other but why don't they both get along? > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- CZ/VZ mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth FMHeaven mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fmheaven/ FS1R mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fs1r/ Vokator mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vokator FM-Synthesis mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fm- synthesis/ http://www.summasounds.de/
Message
Re: [CZsynth] yamaha and casio
2010-09-29 by Summa
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.