Something in this sense was written in that document I've sent, about simplifying and rearranging data. Have you read it? But maybe SysEx datafiles for CZ found on internet were prepared this way and don't need it. I didn't analyzed them. Daniel Forro On May 20, 2012, at 11:07 PM, steve_the_composer wrote: > I am curious to know why you think that editing a sysex file is > necessary to transfer sysex data. Are you talking about stacking up > acks in the buffer so the CZ won't hang? > > > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Forró <dan.for@...> wrote: >> >> I don't have CZ5000... >> >> It looks from that paper that some editing of SysEx file is >> necessary. >> Some kind of hex editor? I did such editing in sequencers - Notator, >> Cakewalk, Opcode Studio Vision Pro... >> >> Daniel Forro >> >> >> On May 19, 2012, at 11:14 PM, cdnephew wrote: >> >>> So you don't set The CZ5000 to recive on the unit it self >>> >>> In which case what's the best way to do it if this is the case >>> --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Forró <dan.for@> wrote: >>>> >>>> MIDI channel in SysEx file and on the instruments has to be the >>>> same. >>>> >>>> CZ synths use handshaking communication protocol normally, which >>>> means >>>> data are sent in blocks (one block for one patch), after receiving >>>> each patch data CZ confirms receiving. >>>> >>>> But there's a way how to do it without handshaking. See the >>>> attachment. >>>> >>>> Daniel Forro >>>> >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [CZsynth] Re: HI there help with SYSex on CZ5000
2012-05-20 by Daniel Forró