The DSS-1 is basically a poor man's Jupiter 8, without the knobs but with waveform sampling and dual delays instead. The DSM-1 has more sampling memory and better multitimrality (16 individual outs!), but the synth section is not as good. The VCF does not have 12 or 24 Db modes or resonance (the DSS-1 does), nor does it have those fabulous dual delays. The DSM is generally considered a bit dissapointing compared to a DSS-1, which is a musician's dream. I picked up a DSS1 for �100 a couple of years ago. Aparts from needing to keep a pre-Windows XP PC working to make the disks with (not an easy task) and the size and weight of the thing (27kgs!), it is fabulous. (or at least will be again when I manage to replace the LCD display) And compliments CZ sounds very nicely (to keep on topic) On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Carl Lofgren <carl_lofgren@...>wrote: > My apologies for being a bit stupid - but I thought the DSM was a rack > version of the DSS - containing the same stuff? No analog filters in the > DSM? > > /C > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
2012-10-25 by Jez
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.