Yes - the 230 and the 1000 also have the strap buttons - but you are liable to get a neck injury using those. As it happens I like being an 80s ponce,which is why I have the DX100 with the buttons/strap a shs10 to really be a ponce....been trying to get the shs200 and AZ1- came close a couple of times,but supreme poncing has so far eluded me....but at least my neck is intact! ;-) ________________________________ From: Jason Adkins <jason_ralf808@...> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, 5 November 2012, 8:49 Subject: Re: [CZsynth] choice of a CZ synth Hi Lee, I forgot to mention on my reply you can also put the CZ101 around your neck with a normal guitar strap if you want to look like some eighties ponce,CZ101,DX100,SH101 and that other Roland thing AXIS? were popular if you wanted to look like an extra in a club scene from miami vice. On 5 Nov 2012, at 08:33, Lee Borrell wrote: > It seems you have worked out some of the problems for yourself- the > 101 has proper facia buttons and is portable.The MIDI implementation > on both is the same - they are essentially the same machine. > There is little difference in terms of sound - they are based on PD > synthesis which distorts phase angle.The VZ is the professional > version. > > The manuals can be found: > > > http://templarseries.atspace.com/synths.html > > Transfer of memory via midi is not as easier task as it might be - > how to do it is on my CZ page. > > > http://templarseries.atspace.com/cz.html > > Obviously the higher numbered models CZ1/1000/3000/VZ have greater > implementation,some include sequencers. > > To my mind the 101 keyboard is a bit "springy" which I am guessing > is due to rubberised contacts - the 1000 has a better keyboard,but > as you say the naff membrane. > Watch out for the 230s - someone on ebay described it as a "wolf in > sheeps clothing" - which I'd tend to agree with. It has ROM voices > to avoid the tedious programming,but 4 RAM slots which will accept > CZ voices (96,97,98,99 last 4 slots) and a programmable drum machine/ > sequencer,and the nice buttons of the 101,plus a built in > speaker,plus cassette storage backup. > > > > ________________________________ > From: mm47 <marcoballins@...> > To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, 4 November 2012, 23:56 > Subject: [CZsynth] choice of a CZ synth > > > > Hi all, > > I'm new to this group! > > I intend to buy a CZ soon (probably on ebay) as I started to love > their sound (heard on some youtube videos). > I might also consider the VZ series, but only if it can exactly also > reproduce the CZ-1000 sounds. > > - Are there differences in terms of sound between the CZ models? > - How do they compare in terms of programming interface? > - How do they compare in terms of MIDI, and which has the most > complete implementation? > > MIDI implementation might be on key point in my choice as I heard > they can cumbersome to program, and anyway was thinking that I could > build a panel for CTRLR.org. > So, I'd choose the one which can be completely programmed via MIDI, > or the one which has most of the parameters programmable. > > I'm leaning towards the CZ-101 or the CZ-1000. > Of the CZ-101 I like the portability and the fact that it could fit > on my desk :) > Of the CZ-1000 I like the 49 keyboard format, but not much (the > feeling of) the membrane buttons (also, are they prone to break/ > malfunction?) > > However my choice will be also depending on the MIDI implementation, > and if I can program them from the computer.... > so any information or advice is much appreciated. > > Thanks. > Best, > Marco > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [CZsynth] choice of a CZ synth
2012-11-05 by Lee Borrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.