Hi Simon, Another good reason for buying a CZ101 is because it doesn't have a velocity/aftertouch keyboard which is money saved,in my experience they are expensive and a pig to fix,not just Casio all of them,sometimes less is more..... J On 5 Nov 2012, at 12:21, Simon Beck wrote: > I posted the folllowing a while back on the Nord forum, under the > topic of "Favourite Synths". I'm not exactly certain why the 101 > worked for me and the CZ-1 didn't, but here we go: > > "I eventually added a Casio CZ-101 to my rig and became quite adept > at programming it, primarily with imitative sounds, from percussion > to guitars, saxes and steel drums. Somewhere I still have a ring- > binder full of patch-sheets that I created. Along with the preset > CT-202, the CZ-101 was my main synth for many years. You can hear > some of the music I made with those two Casios here. > > "About 12 years ago it stopped working, and I replaced it with a > second-hand CZ-1, with a full-size 5-octave keyboard, 16-note > polyphony and velocity and after-touch. All my old patches worked > fine, but somehow the magic was gone. I wasn't too upset when it got > stolen a few years later." > > Simon Beck > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [CZsynth] Re: choice of a CZ synth
2012-11-05 by Jason Adkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.