Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

I always make typos myself, so I understand when others make them, too. Its the broad, sweeping, unsupported, and untrue generalizations that people post which I feel should be corrected, lest someone read them and accept them as true, and maybe make decisions based on them. 

I maintain an active presence in a couple of gear-specific forums and when people have trouble doing things, I like to see if I can figure them out. Some people like doing crossword puzzles, sudoku, etc. Well, I like solving challenges related to gear I am familiar with.  That's why I spent the time trying to solve the CZ sysex/1x1 usb-midi interface issue.

Clearly, not everyone enjoys the challenge of systematic exploration of issues. I get that. 

I am usually rather probative, saying things like, "as I understand it . . . ," "I could be wrong . . .," "here's what worked for me," "have you tried . . . ," "one thing I have found, is . . . " etc.

However, when I go so far as to design a test, spell out the steps I took, and report my results and conclusion, I usually do it without using the probative wording and caveats.

Apologies if I seem to expect the same standards from others that I expect of myself.

Steve

--- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "jammie" <jammie.emma@...> wrote:
>
> and yes im lazy with my spelling and if i make mistakes i cant be arse to check
> 
> as it does not bother me like some people but hey lifes to short