Yahoo Groups archive

Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:42 UTC

Message

Re: [CZsynth] Re: CZ5000 Sequence Data

2017-01-18 by Daniel Forró

OK, I haven't any reason not to trust you.

There's a lot of false or inaccurate statements on the internet pages.

And sometimes there's wrong or missing information even in official  
manufacturer's documents and manuals. I have found enough of them.

Yes, I know about Casio F7 mistake.

For sure I didn't claim that "SysEx on Casio CZ gear doesn't work". I  
just quoted manual and one web page stating that CZ5000 sequencer data  
can't be sent as SysEx dump. I haven't CZ5000 so I can't verify this.  
Your experience can vary.

99.44 looks well for both time and certainty.

Daniel Forro



On Jan 18, 2017, at 10:58 PM, smw-mail@... [CZsynth] wrote:

> 99 44/100% of the time I am 100% sure of what I write as I state  
> it.  ;-)
>
> Seriously, if someone says they cannot do CZ sequencer dumps and re- 
> loads using sysex, they must not be doing them the way I have done  
> them over the decades.
>
> As we have discussed before, this is an open forum and you can doubt  
> my word if you want. I just offer facts, opinions, suggestions, etc.  
> in case they help people who are trying to do things. As someone  
> once said, "Take what you find useful; ignore the rest."
>
> I have not checked the links you provided, but if they say it cannot  
> be done plain and simple, I think they are misstating something.
>
> Technically, you could say that none of the CZ data exchanges that  
> involve hand-shaking work because from the get-go, Casio got that  
> final F7 [sysex EOX] wrong in their implementation.  (I won't  
> explain that here, but it is legendary!!!!!)
>
> However, to claim that "Sysex on Casio CZ gear doesn't work" is  
> inaccurate / misleading / erroneous / not factually true / false  
> (JMO). Claiming that "Casio's CZ sysex handshaking protocol varies  
> from they way sysex was supposed to work and in some cases requires  
> small work-arounds" conforms to my understanding.
>
> As always, I could be wrong. In this case, I stand by what I say  
> with 99 44/100% certainty.
>
> Steve
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.