The Ensoniq EPS samplers had LFOs that would change rates depending on how many notes you were playing... so a "30" rate would be slower when you played more keys- Impossible to make a table with. I assume the Processor was being taxed- and slowed down this process when more notes were being played. I hope the Casios are not like this. On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 03:03 PM, Maxim Potekhin wrote: > Eitan Shefer wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 03:22:18PM -0400, Maxim Potekhin wrote: >> >>> Since you are obviously technically inclined, would you consider >>> recording the signal to your PC and inspecting the waveform in the >>> Wavelab or something like that, then calibrating Casio units to >>> milliseconds? You would the do the comminity a lot fo good. >> >> interesting idea. Imho it should be enough to inspect speed 1 and 100, >> I'm pretty sure the curve is liniar (but I'm not next to the machine) > > > I'm sure it's not. This has been discussed. The Casio units are rather > slopes of the envelope segments, so there has to be a trigonometric > function there. Even then I don't think it'll fit. So a lookup table > would be by far the best, with 100 rows. Of course we can then > use a spline or other regression to make it reasonable.. > > I can host such table on the site I'm currently assembling about > nice and weird machines like CZ, VZ and TG. > > > Maxim >
Message
Re: [CZsynth] way to sync vibrato to midi?
2002-09-20 by xpander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.