Hi Dale, Just reread this...of course, this makes much more sense to use a second (sub) mixer to control the amount and to route fx inbetween...thanks for the suggestion... Bill --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Dale Kay" <dale@...> wrote: > > sorry if this posts twice or more, yahoo likes to ignor my posts a lot > > I use a sub mixer for that. > > here is my normal route for feed back in > synth to sub mixer > sub mixer channel to patch panel > patch panel to any effect, pedal and so on > output back to sub mixer > sub mixer back to synth(s) or to patch panel again to multiple synths > > I have several synths that can feedback in and use it many different ways > and I do not just use the output from the synth, I might effect it in > various ways which > I need to watch the levels ... I often do not just work with one synth but > several > and I often record each level (clean, effect one, effect two if in a chain) > as a separate track too to toy with in the mix > that is why I have 3 patch panels, I can do that at each stage > "think modular" > > my end results are more often used with the tracks you hear at the links > below > never sure what one might call what I do ... ;-) > > sub mixer I use is a Rolls RM 203, I have 2 of those > a 24 channel main mixer too, sub channels get tasked around as well > patch panels are AP , 3 of them, 24 ports each > effects? hard and soft, even the line 6 gear box DI, nada is not toyed with > even a mike to a speaker then feed back in ... > > some things that seem to work nice, having a 31 stereo band eq > or a good parametric, you can really then find the band you want to toy with > and filter out the rest > the bbe green screamer, the ADA flanger, the Roland V-wah ... etc ... > filter queen, killer eq (electrix) > > PEK here and the SE P'08 ... > > latest crazy things, using FM8 with them > > dale > > Inquisitor Betrayer >
Message
Re: getting more out of the mono desktop evolver
2009-07-28 by prof_lofi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.