Thanks for the response. I have some follow-ups: I don't recall having any cancelling issues with the snare and hi- hat when I used the stock TP65 pad that came with the kit. I've only noticed it with since I changed to the Pintech zenbal. Was this problem with the module noticible only when other manufacturer's components were mixed with the kit? Also, was there ever a fix or patch for the "flaw"? I really would like to find a solution to my current problem and not have to buy another cymbal. I actually like the Pintech cymbal; I just hate the low volume and the cancelling with simultaneous snare hits. That's a show-stopper in my book! Still a little confused on the RHH130 and the stand integration. My question is how does the standard hi-hat stand pedal manipulate the hi-hat closing/opening sound? what is the pedal action physically doing to the cymbal? If I were to start tapping out a beat with the hi-hat peddle, how does that register a sound since there is no more hi-hat foot controller pedal that pugged into the module. I assume that connection actually connects somewhere into the RHH130 itself (I presume the RHH130 has two cable connections then). Is this correct. If you could please describe how it connects. --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "jggallow" <jggallow@y...> wrote: > > It's been disappointing. First off, without any module > modification, > > the zenbal cymbal carried very low volume. For months I've been > > modifying the settings to get it to play loud. I just can't push > the > > module any higher. I can't get adequate volume out of the cymbal. > > On top of that, simultaneous hits with the snare and the hi-hat > > eliminate the hi-hat strikes. This has bummed me out. I again > have > > modified the rejection settings on the module but can't keep it > from > > continuing. I'm out of ideas unless someone out there has a > similar > > setup and has it working well. Please let me know your tricks if > > you're out there. > > The problem of the snare cancelling the hi hat entailed a flaw in the > specific rejection setting out of the box when the II came out. If > I'm not mistaken, we discovered it on this board and called Yamaha's > attention to it. It wouldn't have mattered whether the hi hat > component were a Yamaha or any other company's, since the problem was > with the module. Your difficulty seems too similar for coincidence, > though you've presumably had yours long enough to have rectified it > in the usual way. > > > This foul path has led me to some conclusions that may or may not > be > > entirely true. My first thought is that mixing drum components > from > > different manufacturers is tricky and troublesome. > > This idea has more merit with mixing/matching on a Yamaha base than > on any other company's. Most after-market e-drum gear is > manufactured, first and foremost, to be compatible with Roland's. > Most of the time, use with Yamaha gear won't be a total failure, > although it has been at times, but perfect compatibility with Yamaha > has been elusive enough at least to cause inconvenience. Pintech has > always been one of the brands most adaptable to a Yamaha context. > > > My second thought is, naturally, it is better in my case to use a > Yamaha-based product > > to ensure compatability. So if that is true, what Yamaha pad is > the > > right pad for me? > > > > That has led me to research the RHH130 pad now included in the > > DTXPRESS III. It has the right "Look." But I have these questions: > > > > 1) Is this pad compatable with the DTXPRESS II module? Will I have > > volume issues? > > > > 2) How does this pad work? The write-ups on the web say it > attaches > > to a standard hi-hat cymbal stand (which I have, albeit an old > one). > > How does a standard hi-hat stand peddle manipulate this pad? Is > the > > pad split into two parts are the top and the upper and bottom > halves > > trigger the pedal activity? What happens to my current hi-hat > > pedal? I assume that's not used anymore. > > Staying within the Yamaha camp is safest, unless you have good > information or personal experience otherwise. The RHH130 is > compatible with the II. I don't know of any volume issues. It > connects and behaves like your HH65. Most hi hat stands appear to > accommodate it; it just needs proper room to clamp. The pad itself is > stationary on the hi hat stand; it does not work like an acoustic hi > hat, with two cymbals that open aand close. Since you use the stand > for the foot action, your current HH65 would go to pasture, ebay, > another board member, or perhaps to another input as a second kick > pedal. > > Ed
Message
Re: RHH130 Hi-hat upgrade for DTXPRESS II
2005-03-04 by jggallow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.