I quite enjoyed it actually! And I might mention that I am an electronics engineer, do audio design and high performance speaker design as a hobby. I almost don't want to get started on the high-end esoteric "audiophile" equipment discussion -- it's one that I've been involved in many many times over the past 20 years or so. Suffice it to say there are "true believers" and nothing you do will change their mind. My own (as unbiased as I can be) opinion is that audio has a lot of psycho-acoustic elements and not everything one hears (which I believe is different for every person -- after all they each have unique "transducers") can be easily quantified or measured. But I also believe that every sound, coloration and nuance of reproduction and processing equipment can be explained. Sometimes it's just not easy to do. As an old-time audio engineering saying goes, "If you can't measure what you're hearing, you must not be measuring the right thing!" Oh yeah, there is a lot of "hooey" out there too! Matt Pobursky Maximum Performance Systems On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:09:44 -0000, liberatusvirus " \ufffd<liberatusvirus@...>\ufffdwrote: >\ufffdAfter I wrote that thing, I figured that I might have wiped out the >\ufffdwhole board with boredom. Walt said it must have been too much >\ufffdcaffeine; I think it may have been too little. >\ufffd
Message
Re: [DTXpress] Re: Newbie to DTXpress
2003-02-27 by Matt Pobursky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.