On Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 08:13 PM, oldguydrummer wrote: > > I don't beleive EULA applies to a product, typically just software. > There isn't any software included with the Dtxpress II, just > Hardware. And as such there is no "end user" but rather an "owner". > The software you buy is licensed for use, you as the purchaser do not > own the software, you are given, a grant of usage for a specified > period of time. Thus as an "Owner" of the product and not licensee > you would not be subject to a EULA. > You're right about that, however, the module is controlled by an operating system, which is licensed for use by the end user as by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Also, any modification of computer technology can be construed (and has been in court) as reverse engineering, which is illegal. Thus, as an owner, you can be severely fined or even jailed for modifying any piece of technology beyond it's intended purpose. Of course, this hasn't been sufficiently tested in court (yet), there have only been a handful of cases so far, but I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of a copyright infringement lawsuit. Rule of thumb so far seems to be if it has microchip circuitry inside, modification is illegal. Stuart McConaghy Canopus Drums Meinl Cymbals SilverFox Sticks
Message
Re: [DTXpress] Re: DTXpress 3 sounds
2004-02-06 by Stuart McConaghy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.