Theguy Withnoeye said: > would it be more or less of a problem to upgrade the > new cymbal sounds? This is a very open-ended question, and one that I don't know if can be effectively answered (i.e. which variable is greater, "X" or "Y") other than to say "It depends". Suffice to say it would be dependent upon how the new cymbal sounds differ from the existing sounds. A module like the DTXpressII is usually very finely tuned to work with the firmware it has. By firmware I mean both the programs that operate the unit, and the digital sound recordings contained within the unit. If the new sounds were say 24bit samples, and the existing samples were 16 bit, then you would have to make wholesale changes in the D/A (Digital to Analog) converters to allow them to play the different sample rate, not to mention the BUS to carry the data and the horsepower of the processor to process the new amount of data. Again, the answer is mostly "It depends". > should the sounds be stored somewhere in the ROM's > firmware, where to 'clean up' the sound just some > parameters were modified? If the "new sounds" were recorded in the same way as the "old" ones, it might be technically possible for Yamaha to just replace some parts in the existing DTXPress II with sounds that were destined for the DTXPressIII, however, what would be the benefit to them (Yamaha) in doing so? This would have a demonstrable impact on sales of the new units since the old units could be retrofitted with the benefits of the new module, you wouldn't need to purchase the new one. > I really don't have a clue do I? Thats really not the point! :) Asking questions is how we *all* "get a clue" about anything we do not understand. It's only frustrating for me when I have to provide a giant answer to a seemingly small question, only because the answer would make no sense outside the context of an explanation. I would rather give short, clear answers, but sometimes the question itself precludes doing so when it demonstrates a lack of detailed knowledge necessary to understand the asnwer. Please don't hesistate to ask questions here, we are happy to respond and this is one of the few forums I'm aware of where you have very little risk of getting flamed! :) Lets see if I can summarize for anyone who is interested: 1) The sounds contained inside the DTXpressII ROM are NOT easily replaced, and are not designed to be replaced. 2) There is no motivation for Yamaha to do this, nor to provide assistance to anyone doing this. 3) If you are dissatisfied with the sounds in the DTXpressII module, then it would be a good idea to take a look at the new offerings and consider selling your old system to offset the cost. You may also consider asking for kit settings from others to see if you can use a parameter change to get closer to the sound you are seeking. 4) So far, no one I know of has found a way to replace the sounds, and I would imagine it would be much more difficult than it would be worth. 5) The only case I have heard of where Yamaha sent a replace ROM to a user, was to add some pad abilities to some of the inputs that were not there before (search the archives for details on this). This new ROM did not change ANY of the *sounds* in the module, it only changed the parameters you could set for a pad. Does this help answer your questions? :) Vern -- Vern Graner CNE/CNA/SSE | "If the network is down, then you're Senior Systems Engineer | obviously incompetent so why are we Texas Information Services | paying you? Of course, if the network http://www.txis.com | is up, then we obviously don't need Austin Office 512 328-8947 | you, so why are we paying you?" \ufffdVLG
Message
Re: [DTXpress] Re: DTXpress 3 sounds
2004-02-06 by Vernon Graner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.