Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme

I've deleted the review in the files, as well as reference to it on 
the board. Paul reminds me of the copyright issue. Although it isn't 
a long, involved critique, it would be fun to have it available. If 
we can think of any other way to offer it, we will.

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote:
> I've deleted the review in the files, as well as reference to it 
on 
> the board. Paul reminds me of the copyright issue. Although it 
isn't 
> a long, involved critique, it would be fun to have it available. 
If 
> we can think of any other way to offer it, we will.


are u not allowed to post reviews in yahoo groups?

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "peterpan" <malakies2000@y...> wrote:
 
> are u not allowed to post reviews in yahoo groups?

Pete,

In principle, copyrighted material is probably prohibited, though in 
practice, it might not cause much concern. I'm the editor of a 
publication, and we charge for all permissions to reprint, whether on 
the web or not, and we have to ensure that even access on the web is 
regulated to avoid theft. The issue of intellectual property has 
become tricky. But I'll bet that if I asked Rhythm for permission to 
reproduce its review on a web forum with more than a 1,000 members 
and substantial transient traffic, they might warm to the idea, given 
the potential for new readers.

Ed

righto..



--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote:
> --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "peterpan" <malakies2000@y...> 
wrote:
>  
> > are u not allowed to post reviews in yahoo groups?
> 
> Pete,
> 
> In principle, copyrighted material is probably prohibited, though 
in 
> practice, it might not cause much concern. I'm the editor of a 
> publication, and we charge for all permissions to reprint, whether 
on 
> the web or not, and we have to ensure that even access on the web 
is 
> regulated to avoid theft. The issue of intellectual property has 
> become tricky. But I'll bet that if I asked Rhythm for permission 
to 
> reproduce its review on a web forum with more than a 1,000 members 
> and substantial transient traffic, they might warm to the idea, 
given 

> the potential for new readers.
> 
> Ed