Digital BW, The Print

Thanks again Paul for your feedback.  I'm still a bit snowed by the LK/LLK issue, though.  If the LK is ignored then how is it accounted for in the profile?

BTW - Your article on UT7 refers to the setup for Arches Watercolor.  Have you had any experience with the Epson Fine Art Watercolor paper.  While I've been using the Red River GreenPix, my wife prints all of her composite work on the Epson paper.  How is this paper similar or not to the Arches WC paper?

Thanks, Mike


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> "mbrouphy" <mbrouphy@> wrote:
> >
> > ... can you direct me to your recommended link so I'll get it right.
> 
> The links to the inksets by printer and inkset name are at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Inkset-list.html
> 
>  
> > Also, what considerations should I give to using QTR, ...
> 
> 
> If you're a QTR user you might be able to use similar profiles for both printers.  I'm not sure how close the heads are.  You might want to take a look at the ink limits for the same papers printed by the 2 printers you have.
> 
> As I mentioned previously, the LK (and LLK) Epson driver gray substitution interfered with the ability to control the inksets just with the PS curves.  QTR can overcome this -- just ignore the LK.  If both printers are treated as hextone printers with the same inkset and ink positions, the profiles might be close.  I'm not sure about this, but it might be worth checking out.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>