Eric, I think I'll take offense at your statement that 'retired Doctors' taking images on auto etc. are not up to your standards and are giving it away, while you consider yourself a 'pro' and are charging a fair fee for your wares. And your site is pokey, out of date, has misspellings, and I could go on but maybe I should address this to you personally. Oh â" canât do that as your link for feedback does not work. A.J. Berkson Omages Fine Art Omages.com Owned by Alan J Berkson, DDS, Periodontics and Dental Implants [not yet, but close to retired], dedicated amateur, and hardly ever uses AUTO on my Nikon, Leica, or Hasselblad. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "EJ Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > > Thanks Jimbo. I am certainly NOT against people getting out and having fun > with photography or even making a living doing it. But between the retired > Doctors using the highest quality equipment which produces exceedingly well > made images on AUTO and giving it away (photos) and college students looking > to take ANY job to payoff student loans. WOW. I may become a West Texas > whore. or a back alley dealer. > > > > > > Eric Neilsen > > 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 > > Dallas, TX 75226 > > 214-827-8301 > > > > www.ericneilsenphotography.com > > SKYPE ejprinter > > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jimbo > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 3:27 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Photography That Doesn't Suck > > > > > > Ya know EJ ...I could grow to really like you..... :-) > > jimbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: EJ Neilsen > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:59 PM > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Photography That Doesn't Suck > > Dave, Do you fully explain how FB works to your members; not just tell them > to read the privacy agreement? Do they know that submitting a photo to > Photos that Don't Suck, that you plan to repost them? > > Why the hell would anyone promote the creation of orphaned images. I am > sorry you older guys, here at 53, but the fact that your 80 and you don't > care what happens to the profession that you made your living at pisses me > off. I got mine now go figure out how to get yours? Now that is a bit tongue > in cheek but just a little. > > Now granted, Facebook is not Professional photography, it is social media > but it does use professional and non professional photography alike. Too > full of one self, ? sure there are many photos that were licensed at a value > which I'd consider full of it. > > $10 can buy you a web hosting package and another $50 to $100 for a domain; > Photos that don't suck. Once you have a hosted site, there are only the > regular avenue of theft on the internet, as if that's not already bad > enough. I tell clients NOT to post valuable work on any social media, let > alone FB. I regularly see attribution for writers on FB post. I almost NEVER > see a credit to a photographer. People just expect to be able to use one > however they see fit. > > So , sharing good photos - grand idea. Doing it on the net? You get what you > pay for. > > Eric Neilsen > > 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 > > Dallas, TX 75226 > > 214-827-8301 > > www.ericneilsenphotography.com > > SKYPE ejprinter > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of David > Lykes Keenan > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:50 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Photography That Doesn't Suck > > For those of you who use Facebook, I started a group there entitled > Photography That Doesn't Suck. > > In this group, I take a crack at curating photographs that I think don't > suck and posting one or two of these a day. This group was born because so > much photography I see online DOES suck. > > The group is still quite new and there are little over 100 members. > > If you Facebook and would like to be a part of the group go to this URL > http://on.fb.me/Yjqq1D and ask to join. Hope to see you there.. > . > Dave. > > -- > See my 2013 Picture A Week (PAW) Gallery > http://www.dlkphotography.com/paw>originally begun in 2007. > Please join my photography mailing > listhttp://dlkphotography.us2.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=3d9dfbb5b18c48175 > 32a37b90 > http://dlkphotography.us2.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=3d9dfbb5b18c4817532a > 37b90&id=4dd441d8fe> &id=4dd441d8fe> > . > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6099 - Release Date: 02/12/13 > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Photography That Doesn't Suck
2013-02-20 by Alan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.