Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Workflow assistance?
2014-07-25 by michael3442@...
I've done a fair amount of experimentation with these two methods and do not find any advantage to the two step process over the one step. With the one step method I can be certain I'm getting everything the image has to offer without the intervention by the scanner's software. Raw scanned images/negs show up as dark images in PS and that may be seen as a disadvantage; however, that does not reflect on the quality of the file. (I'm not an authority on this method; I've just read a bit and have experimented a bit. If I'm proven to be misguided, then I'll change my ways.)
As for the image(s) in this series (NE Minnesota landscapes in winter), I only shoot when it's completely overcast, outside, thus providing very low contrast. It also may be snowing as can be observed in the present image. With these images, what I "see" eventually turns up as the final print and may be different from what the film/sensor records, but that's the way it always is; the tools are part of the process at arriving at a final image ready for viewing. I'm not trying to be true to the film/sensor; I'm trying to be true to my experience of nature. These images aren't for everyone, but a surprising number of folks find they strike a fairly deep cord. I'll post a couple of additional images from this series that I've recently completed; they'll be up sometime this evening (fri.).
As for equipment, I scan with an Epson 4870 using Epson Scan, process with PS CS5, and print with an Epson r2400 (larger prints will eventually have to be sent out).
Michael
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.