Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemule William Turner

2002-04-11 by Michael Kravit

Julian,

Back to the wet darkroom, eh? Can't say I totally disagree, but a few weeks
when I said that the inkjet prints lacked that luninous glow I got severely
sun burned ;-).

I am seriously considering a wet darkroom for printing digital negatives
made on the 7000. I have seen Burkholders process and it is outstanding both
in Platinum and Silver.

Mike


----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemule William Turner


> Jerry I agree.I've stopped using WR/WT unless I sell the print framed.
I've
> been playing alot with wet prints a lot recently and inkjet is really
> missing that deep black glow of a semi gloss paper. I'm going to try
> coating. I think we need the option of a good glossy or matte finish
> depending on the image. I've got some museo which Robert says gives a dmax
> of 2.2 (I think!) and I'll start with that. if i can combine the deep
> dmax/glow with the inkjet long greyscale range, I'll be REALLY happy.
>
> Julian

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.